Re: Can you tell the difference between men's pant
Quote:
Originally Posted by Berkeley
Why are you looking in said area?
I am not, but the question was could you tell and yes I can. I was in retail for many many years so I could tell with out that. That was a lame mans excuse for how to tell.
__________________
"If we don't learn to live together we're gonna die alone"
Jack Shephard.
Re: Can you tell the difference between men's pant
Quote:
Originally Posted by Praxeas
No that is not what they said. That's kinda dishonest to reword or reinterpret what they said to mean "attractive"....there are many kinds of attractive.
A lady can look attractive by her clothing without wearing something skin tight
It's not dishonest at all. Men wear whatever they want and then determine what a woman should or shouldn't wear based on their attraction level. Opened toed shoes for example, It's not her fault some man has a foot fetish. The issue isn't just skin tight. It's amazing how little Scripture actually has to say about clothing.
__________________
"Beware lest you lose the substance by grasping at the shadow." ~Aesop
Re: Can you tell the difference between men's pant
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baron1710
It's not dishonest at all. Men wear whatever they want and then determine what a woman should or shouldn't wear based on their attraction level. Opened toed shoes for example, It's not her fault some man has a foot fetish. The issue isn't just skin tight. It's amazing how little Scripture actually has to say about clothing.
You say "it's not dishonest at all" then post something not having to do with what you said earlier and why I said it was dishonest. Nobody here said it was wrong because it is attractive that is where your dishonesty comes on.
__________________ Let it be understood that Apostolic Friends Forum is an Apostolic Forum.
Apostolic is defined on AFF as:
There is One God. This one God reveals Himself distinctly as Father, Son and Holy Ghost.
The Son is God himself in a human form or "God manifested in the flesh" (1Tim 3:16)
Every sinner must repent of their sins.
That Jesus name baptism is the only biblical mode of water baptism.
That the Holy Ghost is for today and is received by faith with the initial evidence of speaking in tongues.
The saint will go on to strive to live a holy life, pleasing to God.
Re: Can you tell the difference between men's pant
Quote:
Originally Posted by Praxeas
They really do cut pants made for women differently than those made for men, regardless of how tight they are. Also women's pants in general, not just jeans, tend to be different in other ways in terms of fabric, design etc etc...
It wouldn't matter to a lesbian, transsexual or cross dresser!
The male cross-dresser wears long hair and dresses to identify with feminism ( and some of these don't even wear make-up because the distinction is in the clothing). The butch lesbian or female cross-dresser always wears PANTS to identify with machismo.
Clothing plays a large role enhancing their sexual roles. These abominations know the distinguishment between sexes while liberals and some moderates wonder off in the dark! HOW UTTERLY SAD!
Re: Can you tell the difference between men's pant
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baron1710
So what several of the men on here have said is, if it is attractive on a woman rather than control themselves they would put a tent on the woman.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Praxeas
No that is not what they said. That's kinda dishonest to reword or reinterpret what they said to mean "attractive"....there are many kinds of attractive.
A lady can look attractive by her clothing without wearing something skin tight
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baron1710
It's not dishonest at all. Men wear whatever they want and then determine what a woman should or shouldn't wear based on their attraction level. Opened toed shoes for example, It's not her fault some man has a foot fetish. The issue isn't just skin tight. It's amazing how little Scripture actually has to say about clothing.
Strange it looks to me like all I did was expand on what I said to begin with. And I still stand by both statements.
__________________
"Beware lest you lose the substance by grasping at the shadow." ~Aesop
Re: Can you tell the difference between men's pant
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baron1710
Strange it looks to me like all I did was expand on what I said to begin with. And I still stand by both statements.
you said....
So what several of the men on here have said is, if it is attractive on a woman rather than control themselves they would put a tent on the woman.
And I still stand by my statement that this was dishonest since NOBODY said attractive is bad nor that they should wear tents. Yes I stand by my statement also
Nobody said what you just attributed to them and it is this sort of dishonest mischaracterisation of what someone said or is arguing (strawman argument) that keeps us from having a meaningful discussion and coming to terms or even agreements....not seeing or representing what the other person actually believes.
__________________ Let it be understood that Apostolic Friends Forum is an Apostolic Forum.
Apostolic is defined on AFF as:
There is One God. This one God reveals Himself distinctly as Father, Son and Holy Ghost.
The Son is God himself in a human form or "God manifested in the flesh" (1Tim 3:16)
Every sinner must repent of their sins.
That Jesus name baptism is the only biblical mode of water baptism.
That the Holy Ghost is for today and is received by faith with the initial evidence of speaking in tongues.
The saint will go on to strive to live a holy life, pleasing to God.
Re: Can you tell the difference between men's pant
Quote:
Originally Posted by Praxeas
you said....
So what several of the men on here have said is, if it is attractive on a woman rather than control themselves they would put a tent on the woman.
And I still stand by my statement that this was dishonest since NOBODY said attractive is bad nor that they should wear tents. Yes I stand by my statement also
Nobody said what you just attributed to them and it is this sort of dishonest mischaracterisation of what someone said or is arguing (strawman argument) that keeps us from having a meaningful discussion and coming to terms or even agreements....not seeing or representing what the other person actually believes.
It wasn't a straw man argument at all. The fact is the judgment was made based on the fact that men were attracted to certain features of the women in the jeans and even commented on those features. But then I guess if you don't agree it's automatically a weak argument because you are the determining factor of everything logical on AFF.
__________________
"Beware lest you lose the substance by grasping at the shadow." ~Aesop
Linear Mode
