The Reason Some Apostolics Are Concerned: The Results of Erased Lines - Page 25

ILG · #**241** 10-31-2007, 06:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve Epley

You were Bishops in the PAW???????????????????????????

You said that men were NOW searching for these things.....saying the motive for leaving and so-called compromise was $$$$ and recognition. So, you are saying that elders in the PAW are doing things for those reasons? How do you know?

Steve Epley · #**242** 10-31-2007, 06:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ILG

You said that men were NOW searching for these things.....saying the motive for leaving and so-called compromise was $$$$ and recognition. So, you are saying that elders in the PAW are doing things for those reasons? How do you know?

Yes I sure am. I can see and read.

SDG · #**243** 10-31-2007, 07:41 PM

I wonder how far someone would last calling the AMF or the UPCI churches apostates around here?

Steve Epley · #**244** 10-31-2007, 07:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea

I wonder how far someone would last calling the AMF or the UPCI churches apostates around here?

We have been called worse. However I simply mean that they no longer teach what they were founded on and what they have been known for. Their history means nothing to them. I do not tar brush the entire PAW I am sure some will remain faithful to the doctrine.

SDG · #**245** 10-31-2007, 07:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve Epley

Steadfast the PAW of Haywood-Tobin-Smith is gone. It no longer exists. Years ago they should have fixed the dam now it is too late. It is certainly sad. Those poor elderly saints trapped in those apostate churches.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve Epley

We have been called worse. However I simply mean that they no longer teach what they were founded on and what they have been known for. Their history means nothing to them. I do not tar brush the entire PAW I am sure some will remain faithful to the doctrine.

Then perhaps heresy would be a better term in your context ... as they have not rejected God or the faith.

As for history meaning nothing to them .... once again you reject your heritage w/ your intolerant views that do not coincide w/ most of our Oneness forefathers ... such as Goss, A. Urshan and GT Haywood.

Steve Epley · #**246** 10-31-2007, 08:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea

Then perhaps heresy would be a better term in your context ... as they have not rejected God or the faith.

As for history meaning nothing to them .... once again you reject your heritage w/ your intolerant views that do not coincide w/ most of our Oneness forefathers ... such as Goss, A. Urshan and GT Haywood.

Dan I am speaking of THEIR history that of the PAW! I remind you I am a little over an hour from Indianapolis the HQs of the PAW and where Christ Temple is located. I have preached among the PAW in the past. I have heard the PAW preachers preach for years. No sir they are Apostates NOT the entire group but much of their leadership. I understand what you are saying but the the PCI teaching did not have roots in the PAW although I confess some believed in the light doctrine. They all taught Acts 2:38 was the new birth.

#**247** 10-31-2007, 09:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea

Opining on the quality of the approach used by my UC brethren and how it tickles me is far from intolerant ....

I1 .... you may need a dictionary to define INTOLERANCE.... but if you like I'll post it for you ....

Ok, so its alright for you to say something about people being intolerant but not me? I need a dictionary? Where does that come from? I'm guessing that is some sort of a joke ...

Truthseeker · #**248** 10-31-2007, 10:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AtlantaBishop

The reason some are concerned is they are Control Freaks.

Sometimes control is not bad.

Truthseeker · #**249** 10-31-2007, 10:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sandra

I sang at Bishop Horace Smiths(presiding bishop of the PAW org) church this past Sunday.He feels we worship the doctrine more than Jesus.
I tend to agree with him.

2 John 9-10

9 Whosoever transgresseth, and abideth not in the doctrine of Christ, hath not God. He that abideth in the doctrine of Christ, he hath both the Father and the Son.

10 If there come any unto you, and bring not this doctrine, receive him not into your house, neither bid him God speed:
KJV

Titus 2:10

10 Not purloining, but shewing all good fidelity; that they may adorn the doctrine of God our Saviour in all things.
KJV

RevDWW · #**250** 10-31-2007, 10:10 PM

Since our foundation is supposed to be the Rock and we are built as lively stones, how can a, albeit seemingly strong, wind of change shake us so?

Is it because our lines have been drawn in the sand of time instead of etched in The Stone of eternity?

Quote:

(Eph 2:20) And are built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Jesus Christ himself being the chief corner stone;
(Eph 2:21) In whom all the building fitly framed together groweth unto an holy temple in the Lord:
(Eph 2:22) In whom ye also are builded together for an habitation of God through the Spirit.