Apostolic Friends Forum
Tab Menu 1
Go Back   Apostolic Friends Forum > The Fellowship Hall > Fellowship Hall
Facebook

Notices

Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-20-2008, 02:26 PM
Encryptus Encryptus is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: "New" Mexico
Posts: 977
House churches vs Traditional

Which is better and why?

Is either more scriptural or spiritual?

Can they co-exist or are they by nature exclusionary?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-20-2008, 02:27 PM
Praxeas's Avatar
Praxeas Praxeas is offline
Go Dodgers!


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 45,791
Re: House churches vs Traditional

Quote:
Originally Posted by Encryptus View Post
Which is better and why?

Is either more scriptural or spiritual?

Can they co-exist or are they by nature exclusionary?
I think a system of "house" churches that regularly meet together as a whole would be awesome
__________________
Let it be understood that Apostolic Friends Forum is an Apostolic Forum.
Apostolic is defined on AFF as:


  1. There is One God. This one God reveals Himself distinctly as Father, Son and Holy Ghost.
  2. The Son is God himself in a human form or "God manifested in the flesh" (1Tim 3:16)
  3. Every sinner must repent of their sins.
  4. That Jesus name baptism is the only biblical mode of water baptism.
  5. That the Holy Ghost is for today and is received by faith with the initial evidence of speaking in tongues.
  6. The saint will go on to strive to live a holy life, pleasing to God.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-20-2008, 02:29 PM
Encryptus Encryptus is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: "New" Mexico
Posts: 977
Re: House churches vs Traditional

Quote:
Originally Posted by Praxeas View Post
I think a system of "house" churches that regularly meet together as a whole would be awesome
Can you define system?

And at what point would such a system begin to resemble a traditional church that also has small group ministry?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-20-2008, 02:50 PM
Praxeas's Avatar
Praxeas Praxeas is offline
Go Dodgers!


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 45,791
Re: House churches vs Traditional

Quote:
Originally Posted by Encryptus View Post
Can you define system?

And at what point would such a system begin to resemble a traditional church that also has small group ministry?
I already defined it...a serious of house churches that regularly meet together as a whole...Not sure what you were asking for...

Basically it would be similar to a small group ministry
__________________
Let it be understood that Apostolic Friends Forum is an Apostolic Forum.
Apostolic is defined on AFF as:


  1. There is One God. This one God reveals Himself distinctly as Father, Son and Holy Ghost.
  2. The Son is God himself in a human form or "God manifested in the flesh" (1Tim 3:16)
  3. Every sinner must repent of their sins.
  4. That Jesus name baptism is the only biblical mode of water baptism.
  5. That the Holy Ghost is for today and is received by faith with the initial evidence of speaking in tongues.
  6. The saint will go on to strive to live a holy life, pleasing to God.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-20-2008, 02:30 PM
Rico Rico is offline
Shaking the dust off my shoes.


 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Nunya bidness
Posts: 9,004
Re: House churches vs Traditional

I like the idea of a mix between the two. If, for example, all the apostolics in any given city were to meet in homes for their "regular" services, then meet once a month for a city wide gathering to enjoy some corporate worship then I think we'd have much more unity.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-20-2008, 02:33 PM
Jack Shephard's Avatar
Jack Shephard Jack Shephard is offline
Strange in a Strange Land...


 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: The Island
Posts: 5,512
Re: House churches vs Traditional

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rico View Post
I like the idea of a mix between the two. If, for example, all the apostolics in any given city were to meet in homes for their "regular" services, then meet once a month for a city wide gathering to enjoy some corporate worship then I think we'd have much more unity.
Bingo, but you know that would not fly in every area.
__________________
"If we don't learn to live together we're gonna die alone"
Jack Shephard.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-20-2008, 02:38 PM
Rico Rico is offline
Shaking the dust off my shoes.


 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Nunya bidness
Posts: 9,004
Re: House churches vs Traditional

Quote:
Originally Posted by JTULLOCK View Post
Bingo, but you know that would not fly in every area.

Could you imagine pulling something like that off in a really big city, like Los Angeles? Holy macanoli!!! Everyone would know about the apostolic church then! They'd be renting out football stadiums for church services on a regular basis!! It's blowin my mind just thinking about it. It's a shame something like what I've described has about the same chance that a snowball has in............well, ya know.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-20-2008, 02:50 PM
James Griffin's Avatar
James Griffin James Griffin is offline
ultra con (at least here)


 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The Woodlands, Texas
Posts: 1,962
Re: House churches vs Traditional

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rico View Post
Could you imagine pulling something like that off in a really big city, like Los Angeles? Holy macanoli!!! Everyone would know about the apostolic church then! They'd be renting out football stadiums for church services on a regular basis!! It's blowin my mind just thinking about it. It's a shame something like what I've described has about the same chance that a snowball has in............well, ya know.
I would respectfully disagree that it's not viable.

It would take a special pastor. In my opinion many traditional Oneness churches do not grow because the pastor feels he needs to be in control of everything and is afraid to delegate.

From a purely evangelistic POV it makes sense. Smaller groups would make more individuals involved, and develop their own personal gifts.

Occasional large gatherings in my opinion are also necessary, there is an special atmosphere when hundreds or thousands gather. Large gatherings could also make sure the "network" for lack of a better word stayed on the same page as far as vision and doctrine.

The problem is, and always will be balance. How much control to be centralized and how much in the hands of the house leaders.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-20-2008, 02:52 PM
rgcraig's Avatar
rgcraig rgcraig is offline
My Family!


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Collierville, TN
Posts: 31,786
Re: House churches vs Traditional

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rico View Post
Could you imagine pulling something like that off in a really big city, like Los Angeles? Holy macanoli!!! Everyone would know about the apostolic church then! They'd be renting out football stadiums for church services on a regular basis!! It's blowin my mind just thinking about it. It's a shame something like what I've described has about the same chance that a snowball has in............well, ya know.
Wouldn't ever happen because they all believe a little something different. That's why there are so many small churches of the same kind everywhere.
__________________
Master of Science in Applied Disgruntled Religious Theorist Wrangling
PhD in Petulant Tantrum Quelling
Dean of the School of Hard Knocks
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-20-2008, 03:01 PM
Jack Shephard's Avatar
Jack Shephard Jack Shephard is offline
Strange in a Strange Land...


 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: The Island
Posts: 5,512
Re: House churches vs Traditional

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rico View Post
Could you imagine pulling something like that off in a really big city, like Los Angeles? Holy macanoli!!! Everyone would know about the apostolic church then! They'd be renting out football stadiums for church services on a regular basis!! It's blowin my mind just thinking about it. It's a shame something like what I've described has about the same chance that a snowball has in............well, ya know.
You said it. It is a pipe dream of sorts. The thought is great. It might happen in our lifetime. I just think that there is and will be too much of the judging each other going on there. Look at Youth Congress and even GC. People can not go without trying to point out others problems. It is sad but true.

A side note about the house churches....
They are a good idea to cultivate immature christian believers. They are a fairly good way of talking about doctrine too. Not as a debate set up. I have thought in the past it would be good to have a group of the newbies met so you can do kinda like a new converts class. In this one you could start real basic and even use that one as an outreach method. You could also have others for the more mature believers. Those are some ideas. There are people that would go to home groups and not to a church building per se.
__________________
"If we don't learn to live together we're gonna die alone"
Jack Shephard.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
House Churches: What are your thoughts? ChristopherHall Fellowship Hall 177 03-18-2018 09:29 PM
Green Churches: Churches Building Green ChristopherHall The Newsroom 7 04-14-2008 09:05 AM
Non-Traditional Oneness Pentecostal Standards Hoovie Fellowship Hall 59 04-06-2008 11:08 PM
The House of God Sam Fellowship Hall 6 12-19-2007 09:11 AM
Man of the House tamor Fellowship Hall 12 08-29-2007 05:25 PM

 
User Infomation
Your Avatar

Latest Threads
- by Salome
- by Amanah
- by Amanah

Help Support AFF!

Advertisement




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.