The loss of a General Board Member

[NLYP]

I Just received this email......


I first emailed the GB member and asked this question...

On Feb 27, 2008, at 5:46 PM, Daniel Christensen wrote:

> Hello
> Hope all is well....
> Its all over the web.....the General Boards Meeting...
> Can you clarify?
> What exactly happened....
> WAY too many assumptions are being made.....
>
>
> Bro Dan
>

The response...

------------

To: Daniel Christensen <revdac777@yahoo.com>
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2008 1:55:38 PM
Subject: Re: HEY!

Hi Dan, yes the Board did vote that you couldn't belong to two org. One thing I thought interesting was, Johnny King turned in his license, and said to the board that he could not go the way the org. was going, He couldn't be in an org. that wouldn't uphold the beliefs that are in the manual. so he resigned publicly there at a board meeting.


-----------------
Dont ask......I posted all that needs to be known.

[SDG]

It begins.

[Ferd]

Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea

It begins.

DA, dude you just got scooped!

as i understand it, this was done either IN the GB meeting, or directly after in the presence of many of the GB members.

wow!

[SDG]

Originally Posted by Ferd

DA, dude you just got scooped!

as i understand it, this was done either IN the GB meeting, or directly after in the presence of many of the GB members.

wow!

This does not get better from here, Ferd. It's those innocents caught in the cross hairs that will and are going to suffer the most ....

[NLYP]

Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea

This does not get better from here, Ferd. It's those caught in the cross hairs that will and are going to suffer the most ....

not a bad opinion form the bleechers....
It was IN FACT the right move for the UPCI.

[SDG]

Originally Posted by NLYP

not a bad opinion form the bleechers....
It was IN FACT the right move for the UPCI.

I remember writing this to my DS in my letter of resignation in the fall of '06 ...

"I, also, have come to the realization that neither side will be placated after Resolution 6 passes next year. I feel most for those caught in the middle."

[Ferd]

Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea

This does not get better from here, Ferd. It's those caught in the cross hairs that will and are going to suffer the most ....

DA, honestly I do not agree.

suffering from this WWPF thing if suffering it will be, will in fact be self inflicted.

if one swallows the barrel of a shotgun, they should not complain about the back of their own head being blown off.

[jrLA]

Originally Posted by Ferd

DA, honestly I do not agree.

suffering from this WWPF thing if suffering it will be, will in fact be self inflicted.

if one swallows the barrel of a shotgun, they should not complain about the back of their own head being blown off.

Bro. Ferd....you have a way with words.....I bow!

[RevBuddy]

Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea

This does not get better from here, Ferd. It's those innocents caught in the cross hairs that will and are going to suffer the most ....

I think your description of "innocents" is inaccurate. JK has been a continual proponent of this position...and has had a number of GB run-ins...

[SDG]

Originally Posted by RevBuddy

I think your description of "innocents" is inaccurate. JK has been a continual proponent of this position...and has had a number of GB run-ins...

Elder ... the politicos are not the innocents .... it's the rank and file ... that I speak of.