Apostolic Friends Forum
Tab Menu 1
Go Back   Apostolic Friends Forum > The Fellowship Hall > Fellowship Hall
Facebook

Notices

Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-14-2007, 12:51 PM
BobDylan's Avatar
BobDylan BobDylan is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 653
Serious Pants/ Skirts Question... Not Trying to Debate... Thanks!

Please understand that I am not trying to stir the proverbial pot here. I have a sincere question that I am trying to find the answer to.

Consider the hypothetical: A person, say a baptist preacher somewhere in the US where there is no OP church etc..., is studying the bible, and seeking God in prayer. During this time of seeking God, he discovers the truth of Jesus name baptism, Holy Ghost infilling and tongues, and the oneness of God. Now in trying to please God, and studying the scriptures for more truth, this baptist (formerly baptist) minister stumbles across Deut 22:5. In his study, and considering society of the last 30 years (say this pastor is @ 30 years old), he is trying to find a way to apply gender distinction in dress in a way that is relevant for today. In the society he has grown up in, both women and man wear pants. So in his study he DOES NOT come to the same conclusions regarding pants/skirts that traditional OP's adhere to. Is this person's position acceptible in the sight of God? He is now teaching his congregation and baptizing them in Jesus name, teaching them to seek the Holy Ghost, and is teaching them to lead a seperated life, but he simply has not come to the same conclusion as OP's regarding pants/skirts. Is this a tenable positions for this "baptist" minister? Can he maintain this position and still be acceptible in the sight of God?
__________________
...or something like that...
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-14-2007, 12:58 PM
Esther's Avatar
Esther Esther is offline
Administrator


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 12,362
Quote:
Originally Posted by BobDylan View Post
Please understand that I am not trying to stir the proverbial pot here. I have a sincere question that I am trying to find the answer to.

Consider the hypothetical: A person, say a baptist preacher somewhere in the US where there is no OP church etc..., is studying the bible, and seeking God in prayer. During this time of seeking God, he discovers the truth of Jesus name baptism, Holy Ghost infilling and tongues, and the oneness of God. Now in trying to please God, and studying the scriptures for more truth, this baptist (formerly baptist) minister stumbles across Deut 22:5. In his study, and considering society of the last 30 years (say this pastor is @ 30 years old), he is trying to find a way to apply gender distinction in dress in a way that is relevant for today. In the society he has grown up in, both women and man wear pants. So in his study he DOES NOT come to the same conclusions regarding pants/skirts that traditional OP's adhere to. Is this person's position acceptible in the sight of God? He is now teaching his congregation and baptizing them in Jesus name, teaching them to seek the Holy Ghost, and is teaching them to lead a seperated life, but he simply has not come to the same conclusion as OP's regarding pants/skirts. Is this a tenable positions for this "baptist" minister? Can he maintain this position and still be acceptible in the sight of God?
Yes, he can. That scripture was never about women wearing pants. We took it that way, because at the time UPC was formed MOST women wore dresses. HOWEVER, it is my opinion that scripture is talking about cross genders like the gays.

In other words, you dress to appear at the opposite sex. Never has been about women wearing pants.

Hope that helps.
__________________
Happy moments, PRAISE GOD.
Difficult moments, SEEK GOD.
Quiet moments, WORSHIP GOD.
Painful moments, TRUST GOD.
Every moment, THANK GOD.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-14-2007, 01:09 PM
freeatlast's Avatar
freeatlast freeatlast is offline
the ultracon


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: smack dab in da middle
Posts: 4,443
Quote:
Originally Posted by Esther View Post
Yes, he can. That scripture was never about women wearing pants. We took it that way, because at the time UPC was formed MOST women wore dresses. HOWEVER, it is my opinion that scripture is talking about cross genders like the gays.

In other words, you dress to appear at the opposite sex. Never has been about women wearing pants.

Hope that helps.
Absolutley. If he was "formerly" a baptist pastor, chances are he actually has some thoelogicical training in how to discern or exegete scripture. If he's got some working knowledge of a greek.hebrew lexicon he can look up the wording of Deut 22:5 and see that the "man" in that verse came from the hebrew "Geber", not Iyish or Adam as we see translated to mean "man" in other scriptural applications.

The woman shall not put on the apparrel of a warrior or manufactured articles used to make war.

Deut. 22:5 NEVER EVER NEVER had the implied meaning we oneness pentecostals have given it.

At one time in my life I thouhgtit did because a preacher told me it did.

I have come to realize he was wrong in teaching this and so was I for believing him without knowing what the word really said.
__________________
God has lavished his love upon me.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-15-2007, 09:29 AM
Strongminded
Guest


 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by Esther View Post
Yes, he can. That scripture was never about women wearing pants. We took it that way, because at the time UPC was formed MOST women wore dresses. HOWEVER, it is my opinion that scripture is talking about cross genders like the gays.

In other words, you dress to appear at the opposite sex. Never has been about women wearing pants.

Hope that helps.
Esther...You are Correct.
WE have a culture issue!
That is why most of the missionaries dont even deal with the whole pants thing on the field.
IF the culture overesees dictates a womans "pants", the missionaries usually do not force our interpretation of "partaineth to a man" on them.
And YES I do know this first hand!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-15-2007, 11:16 AM
Felicity's Avatar
Felicity Felicity is offline
Step By Step - Day By Day


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,648
Quote:
Originally Posted by Strongminded View Post
Esther...You are Correct.
WE have a culture issue!
That is why most of the missionaries dont even deal with the whole pants thing on the field.
IF the culture overesees dictates a womans "pants", the missionaries usually do not force our interpretation of "partaineth to a man" on them.
And YES I do know this first hand!
__________________
Smiles & Blessings....
~Felicity Welsh~

(surname courtesy of Jim Yohe)
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-15-2007, 11:24 AM
stmatthew's Avatar
stmatthew stmatthew is offline
Smiles everyone...Smiles!!


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Sparta, TN
Posts: 2,399
Quote:
Originally Posted by Strongminded View Post
Esther...You are Correct.
WE have a culture issue!
That is why most of the missionaries dont even deal with the whole pants thing on the field.
IF the culture overesees dictates a womans "pants", the missionaries usually do not force our interpretation of "partaineth to a man" on them.
And YES I do know this first hand!
The conservative ones do.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-15-2007, 11:26 AM
Barb Barb is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,613
Quote:
Originally Posted by stmatthew View Post
The conservative ones do.
And you know this because...
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-15-2007, 11:26 AM
Felicity's Avatar
Felicity Felicity is offline
Step By Step - Day By Day


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,648
Quote:
Originally Posted by stmatthew View Post
The conservative ones do.
Which cultures do these particular conservative missionaries work with?
__________________
Smiles & Blessings....
~Felicity Welsh~

(surname courtesy of Jim Yohe)
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-15-2007, 11:37 AM
stmatthew's Avatar
stmatthew stmatthew is offline
Smiles everyone...Smiles!!


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Sparta, TN
Posts: 2,399
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barb View Post
And you know this because...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Felicity View Post
Which cultures do these particular conservative missionaries work with?

Gary Edmonds in Taiwan
Chip Shepherd in the middle east
The Lambeths in Brazil
The Nix Family in Peru


My memory escapes me at present of more, but in looking at all those pictures, I would say that the Alvears believe and teach dress standards. I am sure Bro Epley could post many more.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-14-2007, 01:16 PM
Timmy's Avatar
Timmy Timmy is offline
Don't ask.


 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 24,212
Come on, where are the UCs?
__________________
Hebrews 13:23 Know ye that our brother Timothy is set at liberty

More New Stuff in Timmy Talk!
My Countdown Counting down to: Rapture. Again.
Why am I not surprised?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A question regarding women wearing pants... Sheltiedad Fellowship Hall 121 08-19-2012 11:42 PM
Long jean skirts Margies3 Fellowship Hall 4 02-21-2009 12:04 PM
Atlanta Considers Banning Baggy Pants TK Burk Fellowship Hall 5 08-23-2007 09:15 PM
Anyone offended by pants on baby girls? Pragmatist Fellowship Hall 50 08-10-2007 08:09 PM

 
User Infomation
Your Avatar

Latest Threads
- by jfrog
- by Salome
- by Amanah

Help Support AFF!

Advertisement




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.