Texans to TSA: You keep scanners, we'll keep privacy
City board recommends against allowing nude X-rays, pat-downs
Posted: January 16, 2011
6:33 pm Eastern
By Bob Unruh
© 2011 WorldNetDaily
You've heard the Texas jokes, such as: A New Yorker points to Niagara Falls and tells a Texan, "You don't have anything like that!" To which the Texan responds, "Naw, but we got a plumber who can fix it in 30 minutes."
But they don't joke about their rights and responsibilities, which is why they're considering a plan to impose jail time on federal workers who want to enforce Obamacare provisions and are in the hunt to be the first state to require presidential candidates to document their constitutional eligibility.
Now, a government advisory board in Austin, joined by a team of citizen groups, is asking the city council there to tell the federal Transportation Security Administration that the government can keep its invasive airport pat-down procedures and nude-imaging scanners, and they'll keep their privacy.
It is the Austin Airport Advisory Commission that has resolved, in a petition to the city council, that it is recommending the city "oppose the installation of [advanced image scanners] at [the Austin airport] and further oppose the practice of invasive body searching and encourages the city council to inform the TSA, the state and federal delegations of such opposition."
A petition, already signed by tens of thousands, is demanding action against the intrusive airport screening procedures implemented by the Obama administration.
The dispute over the invasive procedures has been heating up since before Thanksgiving, after the federal government announced it was ramping up security at the nation's airports. It is installing X-ray machines that look through a person's clothes, essentially allow TSA personnel to view a nude image of the passenger.
Alternatively, TSA employees have been given instructions to pat passengers' bodies, including private parts, in a procedure critics have called a government-sponsored sexual assault.
Several lawsuits have been filed over the procedures, and some states have announced plans to prosecute TSA agents who violate state pornography or sexual assault laws. Also, doctors have warned of a long list of contagious diseases agents could pass from one passenger to another in the process. And there have been warnings the scanning machines could cause cancer.
Further, a petition, already signed by tens of thousands, was launched demanding action against the intrusive airport screening procedures implemented by Janet Napolitano.
The Austin resolution, signed by Dale Murphy, chairman of the Austin Airport Advisory Commission, included a list of statements that:
* WHEREAS, the [Advanced Image Technology] AIT health risks for passenger and screener, for short term and long term exposure, lack of health safety standards, and medical issues are not conclusively determined by a non-partisan evaluation; and
* WHEREAS, privacy rights, especially for children, sexual assault victims, medical prosthetic users, children, senior citizens, women susceptible to breast cancer, pregnant women and other physical and/or emotional challenged travelers have not been satisfactorily addressed; and
* WHEREAS, the TSA's actions at other airports currently operating them have been the source of derision, ridicule, embarrassment, and other negative connotations reflecting poorly on the airport in question. These actions include the management and are therefore construed to be within their operating policy; and
* WHEREAS, impact on passenger screening operations at the security checkpoints have been demonstrated by the TSA's own video capture to routinely require at least three and up to ten times longer processing times compared to current standards, exacerbating the delay factor for a flight; and
* WHEREAS, the AITs themselves most importantly can be rendered ineffective or marginally by their own admission (A March report from the GAO found that such scanners might not have detected the hidden explosive used by Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab); and
* WHEREAS, the U.S. constitutional 4th amendment issues precluding unreasonable search and seizure, suspension of criminal process, and other basic freedoms of encroachment by the federal government cases being challenged in court are yet to be resolved.
The resolution also explained that the city itself is responsible for actions on its airport property.
The city board is being joined by a citizens' campaign that is operating under the name KeepAustinFree.org.
Testimonials include those of Austin resident Wesley Strackbein, a seventh-generation Texan, who recently told the city council that Washington "has declared war on the Constitution, and it's time for Austin to fight back."
A TSA screener pats down a passenger at a security checkpoint at O'Hare International Airport on November 24, 2010 in Chicago. Security ran smoothly on the day before Thanksgiving despite rumors of mass protests of security procedures. UPI/Brian Kersey Photo via Newscom
"As you well know, the TSA has mandated the use of naked body scanners and intrusive pat-downs at our airports where no probable cause for wrongdoing has been shown – a clear violation of the Fourth Amendment," he said. "This abuse is outrageous, and it must be opposed. Your own Airport Advisory Commission has rightly urged you to forbid the scanners and invasive pat-downs at Austin's airport. Travelers at ABIA must be protected."
He explained the federal government "cannot use one constitutional power as a club to bludgeon another constitutionally protected right. In the name of protecting us, Washington cannot suspend citizens' right to free speech, right to due process, right to keep and bear arms – or 'right to be secure in their persons.' To do so would break our charter covenants and subvert the very foundation of this Republic."
Strackbein said the city's options are clear.
"Now is the time for this council to interpose against the unlawful demands of Washington – to check the TSA's tyranny at the Constitution's gate. This means that the naked body scanners and groping pat-downs must be banned at ABIA," he said.
He told WND, "Momentum is building to see Austin become a safe-haven for liberty."
The government has maintained an unchanged defense of the procedures, with TSA chief John Pistole writing in USA Today recently, "These machines are safe, efficient, and protect passenger privacy. … Rigorous privacy safeguards are in place to protect the traveling public. All images generated by imaging technology are viewed in a walled-off location not visible to the public. The officer assisting the passenger never sees the image, and the officer viewing the image never interacts with the passenger."
Pistole also claimed that the technology "cannot store, export, print, or transmit images," although federal document indicates otherwise.
Politico over the holidays reported, "On the day after Christmas, readers of The Washington Post were given a real treat: pictures of naked men. The men in the pictures were fully clothed, but they were naked nonetheless, because the pictures came from airport full-body scanners. The machines provided graphic pictures of the male anatomy. True, they were no more graphic than Michelangelo's David or Leonardo da Vinci's Vitruvian Man (that's the naked guy with his arms and leg stuck out), but both of those were depictions, not actual people trying to heft their wheelie bags on the conveyor belt."
Read more: Texans to TSA: You keep scanners, we'll keep privacy
http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=251041#ixzz1BGb6s8HQ
Hybrid Mode
