Apostolic Friends Forum
Tab Menu 1
Go Back   Apostolic Friends Forum > The D.A.'s Office
Facebook

Notices

The D.A.'s Office The views expressed in this forum are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of AFF or the Admin of AFF.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61  
Old 02-28-2007, 08:25 PM
SDG SDG is offline
Guest


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: H-Town, Texas
Posts: 18,009
Quote:
Originally Posted by stmatthew View Post
I think that TB's post can be construed as leaning away from Oneness. Now why did you never answer my questions on the other threads?
So the post is less Oneness than the other Oneness posts ...

Reply With Quote
  #62  
Old 02-28-2007, 08:25 PM
sola gratia's Avatar
sola gratia sola gratia is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 411
Most OP's dont recognize distinctions - it bothers them to do so - in this manner I think we fail to recognize legitimate biblical wording and theology
Reply With Quote
  #63  
Old 02-28-2007, 08:28 PM
SDG SDG is offline
Guest


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: H-Town, Texas
Posts: 18,009
Quote:
Originally Posted by sola gratia View Post
Most OP's dont recognize distinctions - it bothers them to do so - in this manner I think we fail to recognize legitimate biblical wording and theology
What are some clear distinctions that you see in the Word, SG? Can the word persons be use if properly qualified?
Reply With Quote
  #64  
Old 02-28-2007, 08:28 PM
mizpeh mizpeh is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 10,749
Quote:
Originally Posted by sola gratia View Post
I would contend most OP's dont know thier own doctrine or anyone elses for that matter - GODHEAD stuff is harder than we want to give it credit for - typically oneness folks do one of two things when discussing the GODHEAD - call names or run away -

they dont have to, there are better options but this has been my experience by and large - - now then my statements here will warrant the same question it always does when the OP doctrine is in any way "tainted"

"Are you a trinitarian?"
Godhead stuff isn't hard, incarnation stuff is where the controversy is.
Reply With Quote
  #65  
Old 02-28-2007, 08:29 PM
stmatthew's Avatar
stmatthew stmatthew is offline
Smiles everyone...Smiles!!


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Sparta, TN
Posts: 2,399
Quote:
Originally Posted by sola gratia View Post
Okay Bro the term persons usually fowls us up (us – meaning “oneness Pentecostals”) the term persons is better defined and really contemporized by modern Trinitarians like the Assemblies of God for instance, as “aspects” – many AG ministers refer to the distinctions: Father, Son and Holy Ghost as “aspects” in lieu of the traditional “persons”… Although they are okay with “persons” – because they understand the meaning of the tern


The term “persons” was used instead of manifestations to distinct the GODHEAD(Father, Son and Holy Ghost) from other manifestations such as the “Burning Bush” – because they felt these where more like aspects and the make up of GOD, and therefore these distinctions, or aspects of GOD, deserved more credence than the burning bush or other such “manifestations” In this manner “persons” was finally decided upon although not used in original Trinitarian language! Its actually not a bad word though, if you understand the purpose of the word, and the intention of it… Instead of my words let me quote a professor from Dallas Theological Seminary – J Hampton Keathley


Let me supply a reference: From a professor at Dallas Theological Seminary
Trinity (Triunity) of God
by
J. Hampton Keathley III

Person: In speaking of the Triunity, the term “person” is not used in same way it is in ordinary usage in which it means an identity completely distinct from other persons. Actually the word persons tends to detract from the unity of the Trinity. According to the teaching of Scripture, the three Persons are inseparable, interdependent, and eternally united in one Divine Being.

It is evident that the word “person” is not ideal for the purpose. Orthodox writers have struggled over this term. Some have opted for the term subsistence (the mode or quality of existence), hence, “God has three substances.” Most have continued to use persons because we have not been able to find a better term. “The word substance speaks of God’s essential nature or being and subsistence describes His mode or quality of existence.”


In this better explained definition of “persons”– I really don’t see the doctrinal conflict Here is why – we have to notice the distinctions of GOD for instance

1Co 15:24 Then cometh the end, when he shall have delivered up the kingdom to God, even the Father; when he shall have put down all rule and all authority and power.
1Co 15:25 For he must reign, till he hath put all enemies under his feet.
1Co 15:26 The last enemy that shall be destroyed is death.
1Co 15:27 For he hath put all things under his feet. But when he saith all things are put under him, it is manifest that he is excepted, which did put all things under him.
1Co 15:28 And when all things shall be subdued unto him, then shall the Son also himself be subject unto him that put all things under him, that God may be all in all.

See here that the Son will subject Himself to the Father – these are distinctive roles – manifestations “persons” in GOD - if we fail to recognize them – just to preserve our view – we do ourselves a dis-service – think of another portion where divinity divided performed distinct functions


(Luk 3:21) Now when all the people were baptized, it came to pass, that Jesus also being baptized, and praying, the heaven was opened,
(Luk 3:22) And the Holy Ghost descended in a bodily shape like a dove upon him, and a voice came from heaven, which said, Thou art my beloved Son; in thee I am well pleased.

Here we see GOD acting in three persons – by that I mean they are totally separate, and distinct in their presentation – revealing HIMSELF to humanity

(Luk 23:34) Then said Jesus, Father, forgive them; for they know not what they do.

Here we again see JESUS – who is GOD – pray to His Father – “forgive them” Listen to me from the moment of HIS birth to this day JESUS was always GOD! Even on the cross it was JESUS! The distinction of persons existed - even though we don’t completely understand it. This is not classic trinitarianism – but instead it simply notes the distinctions of the roles found in the one true GOD – roles, manifestations “persons”
I am probably a little different in my thinking in that I do not believe the flesh of Jesus was God during his earthly ministry. However, I believe that there is no longer any division or distinction post assention.
Reply With Quote
  #66  
Old 02-28-2007, 08:48 PM
mizpeh mizpeh is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 10,749
Quote:
(Luk 23:34) Then said Jesus, Father, forgive them; for they know not what they do.

Here we again see JESUS – who is GOD – pray to His Father – “forgive them” Listen to me from the moment of HIS birth to this day JESUS was always GOD! Even on the cross it was JESUS! The distinction of persons existed - even though we don’t completely understand it. This is not classic trinitarianism – but instead it simply notes the distinctions of the roles found in the one true GOD – roles, manifestations “persons
I agreed with most of your post concerning the distinctions of the manifestations of God until the last sentence. I've spent some time on CARM and a "person" means someone who can say "I" or is a "self". A person is not the same as a role or manifestion or mode.
Reply With Quote
  #67  
Old 02-28-2007, 08:50 PM
mizpeh mizpeh is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 10,749
Quote:
Originally Posted by sola gratia View Post
Most OP's dont recognize distinctions - it bothers them to do so - in this manner I think we fail to recognize legitimate biblical wording and theology
SG,

You are making generalizations without proof. The OP's you know may not recognize distinctions but others do.
Reply With Quote
  #68  
Old 02-28-2007, 08:59 PM
SDG SDG is offline
Guest


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: H-Town, Texas
Posts: 18,009
Quote:
Originally Posted by stmatthew View Post
I am probably a little different in my thinking in that I do not believe the flesh of Jesus was God during his earthly ministry. However, I believe that there is no longer any division or distinction post assention.
Is his glorified body, God, Matt?
Reply With Quote
  #69  
Old 02-28-2007, 09:07 PM
rrford's Avatar
rrford rrford is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,792
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea View Post
Is his glorified body, God, Matt?
Is His glorified body flesh, Daniel?
Reply With Quote
  #70  
Old 02-28-2007, 09:07 PM
stmatthew's Avatar
stmatthew stmatthew is offline
Smiles everyone...Smiles!!


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Sparta, TN
Posts: 2,399
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea View Post
Is his glorified body, God, Matt?
No more answers till you answer my questions.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Oneness Doctrine In The Aramaic New Testament Michael The Disciple Deep Waters 31 12-21-2021 04:34 AM

 
User Infomation
Your Avatar

Latest Threads
- by Praxeas
- by Amanah

Help Support AFF!

Advertisement




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.