Letter from Bro. Chester Wright to Bro. Haney - Page 29

Amos · #**281** 08-27-2008, 10:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Michael Phelps

Fair enough. That's why I brought the conversation to light.

I guess what puzzles me is that you seem to have made a distinction between "false doctrine" and "sin". I've never thought the two to be mutually exclusive.

We are talking about a pastor on an internet forum.

While do believe false doctrine to be sinful, that is loaded language which leaves way too much room for interpretation.

That is my only reason for avoiding the term.

mizpeh · #**282** 08-27-2008, 10:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amos

There is plenty of love in the email--love for Truth.

God's love "rejoiceth in truth."

False doctrines are spread by people.

The messenger takes on something of the nature of his message. That is unavoidable.

The Bible tells us plainly to mark them that cause divisions contrary to the doctrine.

CW was doing that.

What division is the "relevance" movement causing which is contrary to the doctrine? What doctrine are you talking about?

Amos · #**283** 08-27-2008, 10:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mizpeh

What division is the "relevance" movement causing which is contrary to the doctrine? What doctrine are you talking about?

The essentiality of the New Birth and separation.

Indy · #**284** 08-27-2008, 10:53 AM

does mj sign the as?

if so isn't that enough?

mizpeh · #**285** 08-27-2008, 10:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amos

The essentiality of the New Birth and separation.

Thank you.

Amos · #**286** 08-27-2008, 10:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Indy

does mj sign the as?

if so isn't that enough?

LOL!

I think we have just marched off the map.

Y'all have fun.

mizpeh · #**287** 08-27-2008, 10:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amos

He isn't the one who mass mailed it.

And like I said, his church is many times the size of MJ's.

He has nothing to be envious about.

You are wrong on that one.

I don't see the need to name names in an email. He could have done it in a private phone call to the GS. That is why I question his motives.

If upholding truth is his only motive, it still could have been done differently.

Indy · #**288** 08-27-2008, 11:01 AM

i c how this unfolds

cw is afraid that the same soft 1 step movement has taken another form

this is more of the same

mj may be a 1 step guy and may influence others so this is the danger he calls to light

i get it now

thnks for clarification

mizpeh · #**289** 08-27-2008, 11:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Indy

i c how this unfolds

cw is afraid that the same soft 1 step movement has taken another form

this is more of the same

mj may be a 1 step guy and may influence others so this is the danger he calls to light

i get it now

thnks for clarification

You know what the scary part of this is? MJ may teach Acts 2:28 as essential and may truly maintain a separation unto God that might put some UC's to shame but this email has called his ministry into question without substantiated charges! CW may not have his facts straight or the person who reported this to CW may be inaccurate!

Indy · #**290** 08-27-2008, 11:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mizpeh

You know what the scary part of this is? MJ may teach Acts 2:28 as essential and may truly maintain a separation unto God that might put some UC's to shame but this email has called his ministry into question without substantiated charges! It may be all hearsay!

like i said

same witch hunt different jungle

heresy hunters R us at work