|
Tab Menu 1
Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun! |
|
|
05-22-2009, 11:24 AM
|
|
Supercalifragilisticexpiali...
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 19,197
|
|
Re: Pros/Cons of the Three-step doctrine
Quote:
Originally Posted by KWSS1976
But Stephen if that person repents then they want gods spirit to guide them they want that chnanged life so therefore they will have the holyspirit according to scripture
|
I have no arguement here. The willingness to recieve and have the Spirit in ones life is ongoing. Not just an event such as initial conversion or speaking in tongues.
__________________
"It is inhumane, in my opinion, to force people who have a genuine medical need for coffee to wait in line behind people who apparently view it as some kind of recreational activity." Dave Barry 2005
I am a firm believer in the Old Paths
Articles on such subjects as "The New Birth," will be accepted, whether they teach that the new birth takes place before baptism in water and Spirit, or that the new birth consists of baptism of water and Spirit. - THE PENTECOSTAL HERALD Dec. 1945
"It is doubtful if any Trinitarian Pentecostals have ever professed to believe in three gods, and Oneness Pentecostals should not claim that they do." - Daniel Segraves
|
05-22-2009, 11:27 AM
|
|
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Flower Mound, Tx
Posts: 2,791
|
|
Re: Pros/Cons of the Three-step doctrine
I know this is kind of reaching but I know growing up I was told that Peter had the keys to salvation and that is why we should listen to him. Is it a fair argument to say that Peter alone had the keys to the kingdom? I know this is used by the Church of Christ. So is it fair to use this scripture as an argument for the three-step doctrine.
Matthew 16:18-19 (English Standard Version)
18And I tell you,(AE) you are Peter, and(AF) on this rock[b] I will build my church, and(AG) the gates of(AH) hell[c] shall not prevail against it. 19I will give you(AI) the keys of the kingdom of heaven, and(AJ) whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed[d] in heaven."
|
05-22-2009, 11:30 AM
|
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,614
|
|
Re: Pros/Cons of the Three-step doctrine
Good thread idea...
To begin with, guitarman, until I discovered the internet a few years ago, I had never heard tell of 1 and 3 steppers, or PAJCers and PCIers.
One either believed in repentance, baptism in the Name, and Spirit infilling, or you didn't.
And if you didn't, you weren't saved.
Period. No discussion.
Then I dropped in on FCF...whew!!
There I found people...good, sincere people who believed in baptism and Spirit infilling, but if you kicked before this happened, you were saved at belief and repentance.
It's been a mind boggling journey, to say the least.
I apologize for not addressing your point right off, but I felt it necessary to give this preamble to my remarks.
It was on FCF that I knew there were labels for these different beliefs. My view is that to label folks as 3-steppers is a misnomer.
Repentance is not, and really cannot be the 'first step'.
Belief is the beginning of any discussion on salvation, and that's the view of this 'PAJCer'.
Heb 11:6
6 But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him. KJV
As one writer said, "Saving faith is the open door through which the grace of God is extended to a sinner..."
Once we believe that He is and that He came to save, we see ourselves for the lowly creatures we are, and fall on our faces in true repentance.
I need to run and get ready for work, and all of that I have written may seem elementary to the scholars here.
I will try and get back to this late tonight...it's a good subject, and one that we should be able to support.
|
05-22-2009, 11:40 AM
|
|
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Flower Mound, Tx
Posts: 2,791
|
|
Re: Pros/Cons of the Three-step doctrine
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barb
Good thread idea...
To begin with, guitarman, until I discovered the internet a few years ago, I had never heard tell of 1 and 3 steppers, or PAJCers and PCIers.
One either believed in repentance, baptism in the Name, and Spirit infilling, or you didn't.
And if you didn't, you weren't saved.
Period. No discussion.
Then I dropped in on FCF...whew!!
There I found people...good, sincere people who believed in baptism and Spirit infilling, but if you kicked before this happened, you were saved at belief and repentance.
It's been a mind boggling journey, to say the least.
I apologize for not addressing your point right off, but I felt it necessary to give this preamble to my remarks.
It was on FCF that I knew there were labels for these different beliefs. My view is that to label folks as 3-steppers is a misnomer.
Repentance is not, and really cannot be the 'first step'.
Belief is the beginning of any discussion on salvation, and that's the view of this 'PAJCer'.
Heb 11:6
6 But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him. KJV
As one writer said, "Saving faith is the open door through which the grace of God is extended to a sinner..."
Once we believe that He is and that He came to save, we see ourselves for the lowly creatures we are, and fall on our faces in true repentance.
I need to run and get ready for work, and all of that I have written may seem elementary to the scholars here.
I will try and get back to this late tonight...it's a good subject, and one that we should be able to support.
|
Thanks for your input. I have a hard time distinguishing between the timing of belief, and repentance, and faith. To me it happens so suddenly that it could be just a few seconds between the three. We can believe in God and that Jesus is the Saviour without having saving faith. The bible says that the demons believe just like I have friends that I go to church with that believe in God yet haven't submitted their lives to Him.
|
05-22-2009, 12:01 PM
|
|
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Flower Mound, Tx
Posts: 2,791
|
|
Re: Pros/Cons of the Three-step doctrine
I am expecting the three-step crowd to step up and give scriptural support for the doctrine before we start giving the cons of the doctrine.
|
05-22-2009, 12:12 PM
|
|
Supercalifragilisticexpiali...
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 19,197
|
|
Re: Pros/Cons of the Three-step doctrine
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barb
Good thread idea...
To begin with, guitarman, until I discovered the internet a few years ago, I had never heard tell of 1 and 3 steppers, or PAJCers and PCIers.
One either believed in repentance, baptism in the Name, and Spirit infilling, or you didn't.
And if you didn't, you weren't saved.
Period. No discussion.
|
That is part of the breakdown in communication. Some OPs have been told other churches DO NOT believe in baptism "in the name" and recieving the Holy Spirit. Most often though, this is forcing a definition on non-OPs.
Now if they narrow it to involkation at the moment of immersion, and speaking in tongues that changes things...
__________________
"It is inhumane, in my opinion, to force people who have a genuine medical need for coffee to wait in line behind people who apparently view it as some kind of recreational activity." Dave Barry 2005
I am a firm believer in the Old Paths
Articles on such subjects as "The New Birth," will be accepted, whether they teach that the new birth takes place before baptism in water and Spirit, or that the new birth consists of baptism of water and Spirit. - THE PENTECOSTAL HERALD Dec. 1945
"It is doubtful if any Trinitarian Pentecostals have ever professed to believe in three gods, and Oneness Pentecostals should not claim that they do." - Daniel Segraves
|
05-22-2009, 12:21 PM
|
|
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,982
|
|
Re: Pros/Cons of the Three-step doctrine
Ok so we know what repentance is now what does the water do... would everyone agree that is does not wash physically you sins away..
|
05-22-2009, 12:26 PM
|
|
Honorary Admin
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Sandusky, Ohio
Posts: 6,287
|
|
Re: Pros/Cons of the Three-step doctrine
The major weakness of the PURE 3 step doctrine is that it puts EVERYONE in hell, w/no exceptions, regardless of true repentance and a changed and surrendered life to Jesus Christ, who has NOT either been baptized in Jesus' name or has not spoken with tongues. And it puts EVERYONE in hell who HAS received the HGB speaking in tongues but has not been baptized in Jesus' name.
The strength is that it preserves Ac. 2:38 in its entirety and when preached as Holy Ghost or hell, produces a lot more folks who speak in tongues.
__________________
"Those who go after the "Sauls" among us often slay the Davids among us." Gene Edwards
Executive Servant http://www.newlife-church.org
|
05-22-2009, 12:28 PM
|
|
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,982
|
|
Re: Pros/Cons of the Three-step doctrine
|
05-22-2009, 12:31 PM
|
|
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,982
|
|
Re: Pros/Cons of the Three-step doctrine
Any takers with me on the water not physically washing sins away or am I out there by myself on this one..LOL
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:22 PM.
| |