Gospels of Matthew without Trinitarian ending

[Evang.Benincasa]

Originally Posted by FlamingZword

I went back to just the first 10 pages and collected a few things. Here they are

These are statements directed to me by one person.

"Thanks for the warning that textual apostates are active in apostolic circles."

So I am a textual apostate., OK I have been called much worse.

"you do not understand apostolic Bible harmony."

perhaps I do, just a simple put down.

""exact citations" is a deception, form you,"

So now I am a deceiver, OK I have been called a lying heretic by trinitarians.

"Your "scholarship" is such a mess "

just another regular put down

"you are not engaged in sincere and honest study or scholarship."

OK so I am not sincere and I am dishonest

"Why? Simply because you are not doing scholarship."

OK that is nice judgement of what I am doing.

"You claimed 100+ allusions. Simply a fabrication."

So now I resort to fabrications.

And this is only from just a small number of pages, would you call this respect?

FZ, what is wrong with what has been said concerning you? These are perceptions which are followed after one reads what you believe. You know we all have had the same things said about us throughout the years we have been posting. We have all had a turn at the wheel. These things are expected to happen when one criticises our beliefs. Textual Criticism makes Eschatology look like a joke. Yet, Textual Criticism needs to have real evidence, to be proven. With all due respect for our friendship, you don't have any evidence. Other than the writings of early Textual Critics who not only doubted the original Matthew 28:19 but whole entire chapters. Even books, like 2 Thessalonians. My plea is that before you take your show on the road, you shouldve had all this figured out first.

With love

In Jesus name