Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea
bump
|
Okay...I know you're probably at your game...but...here are my questions:
1. I'm still not really clear on your point of view (after skimming through the thread)...is it your consensus that some folks in the OT, and
John, Elisabeth, etc., were filled with the Holy Ghost, the same as we are, and since they didn't speak in tongues, then that proves that tongues aren't necessary evidence? And, is your explanation simply that the Holy Ghost wasn't available freely to everyone, until the Day of Pentecost, but was more like God just filled whomever He pleased? Something like that?
2. With or without tongues, do you believe being filled with the Holy Ghost is necessary to salvation?
3. You did mention that no one needed to be filled with the Holy Ghost while Jesus was with them in the flesh...but what about the thief? Wasn't he saved while Jesus was there? Do you believe the thief was filled with the Holy Ghost?