View Single Post
  #49  
Old 10-14-2010, 09:01 AM
coadie coadie is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,889
Re: Has evolutionism become a leading religion?

Quote:
Originally Posted by jfrog View Post
I think coadies argument is an argument that can be applied to anything. He seems to be arguing more about how knowledge is obtained in general than he is against actual evolution. The problem is if we believe his claims that we cannot know about evolution then we cannot really know about anything. If we believe him about evolution then everything that didn't happen in our lifetime is faith. Coadie must have faith that he had a great great grandmother. Coadie must have faith that America was inhabited by native Americans when the Europeans got here. Coadie must have faith that the Europeans even got here. Coadie must have faith that gravity even existed 6000 years ago. Coadie must have faith that gravity will still exist 200 years from now. Coadie must have faith that The ocean is really as deep as they say since no one has ever been there. Of course if we don't accept coadies view of knowledge then we can know things like what I stated above. And here's the catch, if we believe all those other things are facts, then there is no reason for us to say evolution isn't a fact. If you believe evolution is faith then at least be consistent and say everything that you ever learned in a school book is faith!
Evolutionists say this geneology is false. what say you????


23And Jesus himself began to be about thirty years of age, being (as was supposed) the son of Joseph, which was the son of Heli,

24Which was the son of Matthat, which was the son of Levi, which was the son of Melchi, which was the son of Janna, which was the son of Joseph,

25Which was the son of Mattathias, which was the son of Amos, which was the son of Naum, which was the son of Esli, which was the son of Nagge,

26Which was the son of Maath, which was the son of Mattathias, which was the son of Semei, which was the son of Joseph, which was the son of Juda,

27Which was the son of Joanna, which was the son of Rhesa, which was the son of Zorobabel, which was the son of Salathiel, which was the son of Neri,

28Which was the son of Melchi, which was the son of Addi, which was the son of Cosam, which was the son of Elmodam, which was the son of Er,

29Which was the son of Jose, which was the son of Eliezer, which was the son of Jorim, which was the son of Matthat, which was the son of Levi,

30Which was the son of Simeon, which was the son of Juda, which was the son of Joseph, which was the son of Jonan, which was the son of Eliakim,

31Which was the son of Melea, which was the son of Menan, which was the son of Mattatha, which was the son of Nathan, which was the son of David,

32Which was the son of Jesse, which was the son of Obed, which was the son of Booz, which was the son of Salmon, which was the son of Naasson,

33Which was the son of Aminadab, which was the son of Aram, which was the son of Esrom, which was the son of Phares, which was the son of Juda,

34Which was the son of Jacob, which was the son of Isaac, which was the son of Abraham, which was the son of Thara, which was the son of Nachor,

35Which was the son of Saruch, which was the son of Ragau, which was the son of Phalec, which was the son of Heber, which was the son of Sala,

36Which was the son of Cainan, which was the son of Arphaxad, which was the son of Sem, which was the son of Noe, which was the son of Lamech,

37Which was the son of Mathusala, which was the son of Enoch, which was the son of Jared, which was the son of Maleleel, which was the son of Cainan,

38Which was the son of Enos, which was the son of Seth, which was the son of Adam, which was the son of God.


Since you claim to have truth, give us the correct geneology.

The first thing we see in a false religion is they claim another religion is not true. Tell us what the true facts are.

What is the jfrog geneology including all names.
Reply With Quote