I didn't think you would back off.
The only one making it about me........is you!
I'm discussing scriptural truths, yet you have, in a couple of instances, made remarks about me.
Ok, so if "personal shot" is language that is too strong for you, how about, "You made a personal remark"? Better? Accurate? You said, "You like to argue just to be argumentative". You now say, "You are wound WAY too tightly." I, along with anyone that has a registerable IQ, would see those as personal remarks about me, not as scriptural observations. So it appears to me that any statements made about me has been by you, not me. So the party guilty of making it "all about me", isn't me. It's you.
"For wherein thou judgest another, thou condemnest thyself, for thou that judest doeth the same things." Hmmm.....
Anyway, I won't be surprised if you, again, derail the conversation and make further personal observations about me, but I can hope, right?
So allow me to summarize the events so far.
1) You seemingly discredit my statements by saying that I'm just wanting to argue.
2) I say that you took a personal "shot" at me but that I won't return in kind.
3) You observe that I don't understand what a "shot" is (maybe you could teach me) and then say that I'm wound too tightly and making it all about me.
Would that be an accurate assessment? Interesting strategy, I must confess. You make negative observations about me and when I say that I won't return in kind, you accuse me of making it all about me.
Very nice!
You have completely derailed the conversation from what it was originally about! I've nearly forgotten myself!
