Interesting topic, I see three issues.
1. If the new crop of dissenters are to leave should be they hold to the ethical standard of leaving quietly without seeking to influence (which the WPFers did not?)
2. If they stay should they attempt to use the resolution process to make changes first, as some did to the Holiness article in 1952 (which changed the standing policy from the merger, including a holiness article borrowed from the PCI manual?)
3. Does this mean uniformity of every minute belief trumps unity of spirit? How does this fit with
Romans 14?