Quote:
Originally Posted by Evang.Benincasa
Really? Jesus defended you when you were guilty? I thought you REPENTED so that you could be forgiven??? Where do you draw the line, Brother? You are supposed to be APOSTOLIC? And now you insinuate you are capable of defending someone you believe did WRONG in the eyes of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, whom you are supposed to believe in, supposed to even, in fact, carry HIS SPIRIT around?
My goodness, am I communicating with Holy Ghost filled people, or just intelligent elements of society? Please clarify. I'm astounded at times the discussions I have with people professing to have the Lord and Savior Jesus Christ dwelling in their bodies, their TEMPLES. . . .dare I write further and suggest. . .people who KNOW JESUS IS GOD and not a part of God???
We are to be a LIGHT amongst darkness, not join them!!!
Excuse me but if a child molester and rapist need defense then they should seek counselors who are like unto them. NOT those who are supposed to profess righteousness. Maybe you didn't understand my question, because to get those individuals charges dropped you would have to find loopholes, and therefore, lie.
Brother Benincasa
www.OnTimeJournal.com |
Once again. You are better than this.
A criminal defense attorney does not defend a client and certainly does not condone their actions.
They defend the constitution of the United States of America.
If the state puts on their evidence, follows the rules of procedure, and a jury convicts and sends to prison, then the defense attorney has done his job.
If the state cannot meet the burden of proof, follow correct procedure, or the jury is not unanimously convinced of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, then there is no conviction.
I don't think there is anyone on this forum who has 15 years criminal experience worked for two different district attorney offices and was a defense attorney in between those positions. I have been involved in over 5,000 criminal cases.
I have seen the innocent go to prison. I have seen false confessions given. I have seen evidence falsified. And I have seen the guilty walk. I have tried cases from both sides where the issue was not guilt but appropriate punishment.
The system is flawed, but it is still the best system on earth.
And to attack the office of defense attorney is to attack due process, and by proxy the constitution of this country.
As I stated at first DB, I know you are better than that, so why can't we stick to the issues of the thread?
Be blessed.
JAG