Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr. Vaughn
Thank you kindly for totally wasting your time with trying to prove something to me that I already know... you absolutely missed the entire point of the thread.. it was never to elevate Branham to the status of Jesus.. it was to make the point that even people whom Jesus encountered if they had no faith even HE COULDNT HEAL THEM....... trying to show that just because people were unhealed in branhams meetings while so many others were... was not a slam on bro. Branham... if they had no faith of if it wasn't Gods timing for their healing.. they would leave unhealed... that was the point.. so sorry you missed it
|
Dr. Vaughn,
I appreciate your thanks for me wasting my time, but there you go making more mistakes. Sir, perhaps you feel it's a waste of time, but I don't find it a waste of time to take a stand for the name of Jesus. I'm sorry that you would find that a waste of time. Had I been standing for the name and character of William Branham, I'm sure you would have applauded me.
Regardless of what you want to say the "point" of the thread was, you're the one who said that Jesus COULDN'T heal some and it's obvious that the real point wasn't about faith, but it was about bringing Jesus down to simply the level of imperfect men, in order to justify William Branham's failures in his ministry. And again, I'm not here trying to bash William Branham by any means, even though I do not agree with his doctrine, but by the same token, I will not sit idly by and watch as you try to bring my Lord down in the eyes of others.
Again, you should confess that you're dead wrong on this issue and you and anyone who truly understands the deity of Christ should know that you're wrong on this.
God Bless You My Friend...