Quote:
Originally Posted by staysharp
Thanks, not only that, the word "abomination" is very complicated and tricky. Doesn't mean the unpardonable sin...also, what was an "abomination" to God under the law would have been judged against the Mosaic law. Just as the eating of unclean meat, touching dead things, eating with unwashen hands, etc. Once the law was fulfilled in Christ, we are now set at liberty against the judgment of the law. So, this verse even if it was an "abomination" at that time and meant what some think it did (men's pants) does not apply - post Mosaic law, hence Calvary. This is one reason Peter had such difficulty with the Gentiles. God had to show him a vision and tell him to "slay and eat".
It's about time some people get a hold of Peter's vision. The law is over. Jesus fulfilled it in His sinless flesh. God is doing a new work, what was illegal under the law, is now legal in Christ. Of course, with the exception of the Eternal Moral Law which preceded Moses.
BTW, if those who preach this really believed it, women shouldn't wear the following; PJ's with a divided thigh, husbands socks, baseball caps, your husbands coat when your cold and he's not...Hello???
|
No body really believes it !
I remember seeing the girls from an area upc on the ice skating rinks and ski slopes. Wearing what ever under their skirts, from long johns to their dads blue jeans. Looked pretty wierd.
My thoughts were this, if they REALLY believe that split legged garments were an an abomination.....how would wearing skirts over the top of pants UNABOMINATE what you just peached last sunday night was an abomination.