View Single Post
  #192  
Old 09-07-2007, 02:02 PM
redeemedcynic84
Guest


 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by BobDylan View Post
They were considered heretics by the Roman Catholic church. WE (oneness) were considered heretics by the Roman Catholic church. I think WE (oneness) have alot more in common with the Paulicians that we do the [Roman Catholic] "church" that accused them of heresy. I know at least two oneness studenst of history, both PhD.s, that believe the Paulicians were oneness.

YOU would be hard pressed to prove that Iraneaus was a trinitarian! You would also be hardpressed to prove that Polycarp, Clement of Rome (95AD), and Ignatius were anything BUT monarchian!
"WE" (meaning oneness) weren't considered anything by the Roman Catholics until the 1900s... You could argue that we are similar to Monarchians, but that doesn't mean we are monarchians... we're not...

we might be considered heretics (I'm not even sure) but we weren't considered anything until we existed (recently)