View Single Post
  #21  
Old 07-17-2007, 07:37 AM
COOPER's Avatar
COOPER COOPER is offline
Hello AFF!


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Amarillo, Tx.
Posts: 3,611
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheltiedad View Post
I posted this within another thread and didn't get a response, and I would honestly like to know the answer so I am posting it again here.

Why is it that the "cut" of a robe was enough to separate gender in biblical times, but the "cut" of trousers is not enough to separate gender in modern times... and if we go down the modesty path here, then neither men nor women should wear pants. Should not men and women be equally modest?
Good one Daddy-o !!!!!! I have been thinking of the same thing for the last week.

Holiness Standards Doctrines and reasons are like an old rusty bucket that was used for shot gun practice.

If pants are immodest for women; then they are for men too.

Men have a body, butt, thighs not to mention :sshhh *you know* women look at mens butts and *you know* censored .
Reply With Quote