[donfriesen1]

Originally Posted by Esaias

Quote: Originally Posted by donfriesen1 View Post

See post 137, second para, where Esaias says "I never suggested that 1 Cor 11 is a command for anybody BUT the new covenant church of God." where it appears you say this very thing. This is saying to me, 'a command for anybody BUT ONLY the new covenant church of God'. Perhaps you would now want to reword it in a way that doesn't suggest you believe it to be so, leading to misunderstandings.

Please note that Don said misunderstandings and not misleading.

1) I asked chatgpt the following about about Esaias's statement: What does this mean: "I never suggested that 1 Cor 11 is a command for anybody BUT the new covenant church of God."

Its unbiased answer: The statement "I never suggested that 1 Cor 11 is a command for anybody BUT the new covenant church of God" means that the speaker is clarifying or emphasizing that their interpretation of 1 Corinthians 11 applies specifically to the "new covenant church of God" and not to others outside of this group.

2) I asked Meta Ai the following about about Esaias's statement: What does this mean: "I never suggested that 1 Cor 11 is a command for anybody BUT the new covenant church of God."

Its unbiased answer: This statement means that the speaker believes 1 Corinthians 11 (a chapter from the Bible) contains a command, but this command is specifically intended for the "new covenant church of God".

My English skills are in line with the skills of others, bringing into question your skills. When have you last had a check-up? You've been put on notice. Readers, be aware of Esaias's answers, for he says things he does not mean and will accuse you wrongly if you call him out on it.

We are confused by Esaias's two different responses. We politely ask for clarification so we will know what it is that Esaias believes. Do you believe that Paul only commands for the NT people?