Quote:
Originally Posted by donfriesen1
The following is quoted from another post in this thread. "This poster won't be replied to by donfriesen1, because many of his responses are only attempts at character assassinations - poor hermeneutics. He has stated in another post that his role is to mock me. Imagine that, an evangelist sees his role is to mock the one he thinks is lost.
|
Don, you just can’t handle being challenged on your beliefs.
You believe that the scripture is filled with opinions of the writers. Your understanding has been borrowed from ideologies which also see God as flawed. A bungling deity who can’t properly relay His knowledge to His followers. Now, as far as you being mockable? Sorry, but you are the one who provides me with such good material. Also evangelist not mocking? Does evangelism mean giving a shoulder massage and back rub to anti Gospel nonsense? Ah, no. Don, I don’t know what church you attend or if you even still attend a church. I’m not trying to win you, convert you, or be a friend you. That’s an endeavor which takes two to make any relationship work. Which you have shown everyone that you aren’t interested in any of that. I’ve watched people post with you and show you nothing but respect and kindness. To only watch you come back at them with your disrespect. So, don’t DM me with your nonsense. Don’t play the victim, because there is way too much evidence showing your ecclesiastical passive aggressive behavior. You want to believe stupid stuff, have at it. You want to discuss stupid stuff be my guess. But don’t go wee wee wee all the way home when you are called out on it. You have been proven wrong in multiple threads. At least you could be a good sport instead of a sore loser.