You cite verses when Jesus speaks as man to prove that he is a just a man. I can't disagree with those. I believe Jesus was fully man, so had a human will and a soul, and spoke as man many times. I then show you verses where Jesus speaks as God, and only God could speak like that, or verse were Jesus is said to be God, and then you go with "it could also be a figure of speech meaning actually....". Pretty bold figures of speech I guess. I am still wondering what interpretation you are going to give to
Isa 9:6. I am actually amazed of the explanation you give to
Col 2:9. I have never heard of that before. So when we are resurrected we are going to have the fullness of the Godhead bodily dwelling in us?
Here, we are again back to the same issue I find all the time with false doctrines: lack of consistent hermeneutics. You just can't believe Jesus is God revealed in flesh, so you try to find an explanation to the verses by making it just a figure of speech or twisting is plain meaning.