View Single Post
  #22  
Old 03-19-2016, 07:53 PM
CC1's Avatar
CC1 CC1 is offline
Administrator


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 16,840
Re: Terry Shock Leaving Alexandria

Quote:
Originally Posted by n david View Post
Whatever Anthony Mangun decided is between him and Terry Shock. You accusing Mangun of nepotism is uncalled for. Even if POA does make Gentry pastor one day, it's none of your concern.

Do you know for fact this is why TS is leaving or are you just spreading stuff?
I am not the one who said TS was leaving. I have heard that he is but that was some months ago and I don't have any new information. I was simply commenting on the FACT that AM did not go through with the transition to TS when he turned 65 as he had said he was going to do for many years.

For what it is worth I thought it was a mistake for AM to repeatedly emphasize very specifically what his succession plans were so many years in advance and then emphatically repeating them year after year.

As far as your notion that it is nobody's business and we should just all stick our heads in the sand and not have questions or wonder about Pentecostal successions I am sorry but those days of Preachers being some sort of kings whose actions cannot be evaluated or questioned are long gone.

You can have great respect for men of God and honor them, etc without burying your head in the sand and ignoring that you have a brain and common sense.

Your admonition for folks to just "move along now, there is nothing to see here" is absurd. Are there instances where a son inheriting a church is a good thing? I am sure that happens many times. Are there instances where a man's judgement and ability to hear the will of God is colored by his carnal desires for his son? Also yes. Sadly I think the latter happens more often than the former. No hard statistics just over 50 years of anecdotal observation. You can't get away with just telling people it is none of their business anymore what goes on. If pastors have public ministry's and want their voices to be heard and respected they should have no problem with public or private comments on their actions as long as there are not false accusations or misrepresentations.
__________________
"I think some people love spiritual bondage just the way some people love physical bondage. It makes them feel secure. In the end though it is not healthy for the one who is lost over it or the one who is lives under the oppression even if by their own choice"

Titus2woman on AF
F


"We did not wear uniforms. The lady workers dressed in the current fashions of the day, ...silks...satins...jewels or whatever they happened to possess. They were very smartly turned out, so that they made an impressive appearance on the streets where a large part of our work was conducted in the early years.

"It was not until long after, when former Holiness preachers had become part of us, that strict plainness of dress began to be taught.

"Although Entire Sanctification was preached at the beginning of the Movement, it was from a Wesleyan viewpoint, and had in it very little of the later Holiness Movement characteristics. Nothing was ever said about apparel, for everyone was so taken up with the Lord that mode of dress seemingly never occurred to any of us."

Quote from Ethel Goss (widow of 1st UPC Gen Supt. Howard Goss) book "The Winds of God"
Reply With Quote