Thread: The Original Matthew 28:19 Restored
View Single Post
  #35  
Old 05-31-2015, 11:07 AM
Jito463 Jito463 is offline
J.esus i.s t.he o.ne God (463)


  
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 2,806
Re: The Original Matthew 28:19 Restored
Quote:
Originally Posted by votivesoul View Post
Why is the KJV your standard by which you measure other translations? If you don't know Greek or Hebrew well enough why take the KJV at face value? You could be basing your standard on a faulty translation, choosing to stick to something that shouldn't be held as the standard by which other translations are measured.

Give this a read:

https://bible.org/article/why-i-do-n...vailable-today
Why do you feel the need to denigrate the KJV at virtually every turn?

Quote:
Originally Posted by good samaritan View Post
Before the internet, and all the multitudes of information available this discussion wasn't very prominent. Now with the use of the internet everyone is a biblical scholar, and they call everything into question; thus muddying the water for people to know what to believe. In my education background there is no way for me to prove or disprove someone else's Hebrew/Greek so I will stick with what I first came to know as the Bible.

I have other translations in my home that I revere as the scriptures, but by far do I have more confidence in the KJV being the most reliable. I can't prove nor disprove it, but it is a walk of my faith. In my walk with God I will continue to search for ways to be closer to Him and with an open mindedness in that path. I am not saying anyone is wrong about using other translations, but I think it is possible that there may be divisions created doctrinally if they each have different messages.

If I was a new believer this information overload would be hard to my faith. I am glad to have gotten a root system in God before ever getting the internet. The internet is an avenue of study, and many times I see and hear things online before coming against the issue in my personal life. I think that some things could confuse the simple or the new convert. I want people to view scripture as absent of error, but if people keep saying it must be corrected what is a new convert to think.
Your last couple of posts could just as easily have been posted by me. We're of a like mind in this matter.
Reply With Quote