Jason also fails to explain faith. He says "the bible says believe in Jesus and you are saved, no baptism required, no Holy Spirit required."
In that case then neither is repentance required. "Oh but that's part of believing." Is it now? Then why is baptism not part of believing?
He makes much ado about scripture not STATING the three thousand in
Acts 2 spake in tongues. Well it also doesn't actually say they repented, either. Jason allows himself to ASSUME they did, because his theology demands it. But what is good for the goose is not good for the gander, I suppose.
Jason says receiving the Spirit isn't necessary to be saved. Amazing how professing Christians believe one can be saved without having God's Spirit, isn't it? To avoid that clear dilemma, they then say people just don't speak in tongues anymore when they receive the Spirit.
Oh, but Jason is Pentecostal, you say? Then Jason has a Johnny come lately religion. Who believed in a post-conversion second reception of the Spirit with tongues as evidence prior to 1905? Or 1900?