I'm pretty ambivalent here, but this seems the best explanation. What then is "
thy (satan's) seed..." gonna be? This seems to support "serpent seed," not refute it?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sabby
"Serpent Seed" is as sturaaange as the LDS's doctrine of Lucifer and Jesus being related, imo...
The serpent (in whatever form) certainly deceived Eve, but to interpret the greek word as sexual intercourse sounds like a Hollywood "B" movie plot. This is what happens when the Biblical (read OT+NT=Bibilical) hermeneutic isn't used. Branhamites can't balance this teaching with what the rest of the text explains.
Are Branhamites trying to become mainstream by burying this teaching (much like the LDS has placed the Jesus/Lucifer relationship under the radar)?
|
Which would be what, the bolded part? How does the surrounding text negate serpent seed, to you? And do me a favor, could you skip the link, and just put it in a paragraph? Ps I have been asking this Q for
years now, hmm...