JR Ensey's, Ultra-Con hero, thoughts on "light doctrine", this month:
Quote:
|
Younger ministers would be wise to consult with elders when new spiritual fads and interesting doctrines come down the pike. Some may be new, but many are merely rehashes of old theories discredited long ago. There has recently been a resurgence of elements of the Light Doctrine and Dominion Theology. We are all aware of the damage done by the Divine Flesh doctrine and some of the recent Emergent and Hipster theories and methodologies. Sometimes younger ministers fail to consult elders because they think they are “out of the current loop” and not “with it.” I understand. I was young once. We should be relevant, but relevant to the Word, to proven doctrines, to clear thinking—not to the latest smart aleck megachurch pastor from Metropolis who publishes a book called “This Is How I Did It.” Better find out what “It” is before running after him or his ideas.
|
He tries to discredit the Light Doctrine here:
http://jrenseyblog.wordpress.com/2009/05/
Emergents may not want to consult Lee Stoneking???? Tangent: Ensey may want to become more aware of the damage Holy Hair has done ... when tossing out Divine Flesh.