Ultra Cons Angry at Today's Meeting!!!!!
 

JUst received a report that a number of Ultra Cons Sat angry with their Arms folded when it was announced that Ken haney was re-elected by an overwhelming vote !

eye witness reports said they even refused to stand in honor as most everyone else did !



YOUR THOUGHTS ON THIS ????

Good!

***** EXTRA ******


Did you hear that A Mangun got up and Made a Big plug for the TV resolution in today's meeting ????


I'm surprised :hypercoffee

all those guys probably pastor us 4 and no more in timbuctu, lol, did he really do it, lol, dt:hypercoffee

Yes ! he said we need to use ever technological resource available today to reach the world with the gospel AND said " Brethren I am asking you to prayerfully consider your vote tomorrow " !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I think it's sad.

I am not surprised.
I witnessed them with a similar attitude (pout) when Bro. Abbey was announced Western District Superintendant a couple of months ago.
So am I surprised? No.
Disappointed? Yes.

They've got the same britches to get glad in that they got mad in. *shrug*

now wasn't it stedfast and coon that said they know for a fact that none of the people I listed on that list was for the TV resolution!!!!!

what planet are those 2 vacationing on ???????????:killinme

overwhelming vote?? so what, two maybe 3 people are these "angry ultra cons"?

I think they meant that the knew that not ALL of them on the list were, not that NONE of them on the list were.

LOL! My grandma used to say that all the time!

wow, i wonder how that was taken, lol, but of course many allready knew how he felt, somebody has to try and wake them up, besides they have almost waited to late, dt:hypercoffee

My thoughts on this?

Childish nonsense.

"If I can't have my way I just won't do anything. So there". (Pouched lip included).

Much could be said about growing up, acting one's age, christian character, and spiritual maturity.

The problem is, they never do get glad.....

resounding amen for the ladyrev, lol,dt:hypercoffee

Since Steadfast and Coon are obviously not available to comment, please allow me! :D

They DID NOT say that no one on the list was pro res #4! They said it was untrue that ALL on the list were pro res #4! :)

I don't think you should talk about your fellow laborers in the LOrd in suc h a disrespectul manner - you can say it without being mean spirited

Hopefully they will be successful in being angry yet sinning not.

you are wrong!! go and take a look at what stedfast said!

he said he knows for sure that 100% of the persons on my list are against the TV R.

What did you consider to be desrespectful?

her tone of voice

no, he said he knows one of the people on the list and is 100% sure he DOESNT have a tv

She's not being mean spirited...just honestly expressing how she feels.

:killinme

Tone of voice? She typed it... :p


And what Pianoman said, which was what I already said but he's the gloryhog that had to repeat it, about what Coony and Steadfast said is how it is.....your comprehension is off on your reading of it, Thad.

He did and then CS said that maybe two on there weren't.

my question is when were these kind of men not angry, it is there only motivation for all they do,lol, dt:hypercoffee

Just curious Thad.

I believe you were the one that said that the ministers in question sat in anger, with arm crossed, and refused to stand in honor of.....

Would you consider that "respectful Manner" ???

Here's what Steadfast said about the list that Thad posted that were for Res 4

Could mean all of them are not for TV or that not all of them are for TV.

you see, i was right after all

do i sense sour grapes ???

;>)

:)

:0


THANK GOD that AM asked eveybody to pray before the vote tomorrow....

ALL that hear from God will vote against R4 (not to be confused with rrford)

He qualified later in the thread.

Everyone knows AM is for the resolution.

don't worry rroford is no longer around here- he's still mad at me (really)

Renda, your swell.

:killinme:killinme:killinme:killinme

It would seem that if it were Steadfasts intention to state that the list was completely wrong he would have said "none of them are" rather than "all of them are not"

Sour grapes? Thad I truly do not understand why you are being so defensive???

I merely asked if that were indeed what YOU said, and how you would interpret such non-verbal communication.

So to repeat.

I believe YOU said that the ministers in question, sat with arms folded, and that they were angry, and that they refused to stand with their fellow ministers in a display of unity.

My question was would YOU consider that to be respectful behaviour of their part?

About what?:sos