![]() |
Re: UPC Pastor Convicted of Slander in Pulpit!
Quote:
|
Re: UPC Pastor Convicted of Slander in Pulpit!
Quote:
Secondly, I would think the only really wise time to reveal things like this to the congregation would be: 1. In extreme circumstances, when there's no way to avoid apprising the church of the situation. 2. Before a select group of people(saints & elders)--not at a regular church service where sinners and visitors could be present. IMO, if the pastor had been specific to the charge of "exhibitionism", he might have gotten away with it. It could have been argued that the church felt wearing a bikini was immodest and therefore the wife's actions fell into the category of exhibitionism. However, I think he was purposely vague because it's the most insignificant accusation from a moral standpoint. He had to leave it open ended, or else someone would have been saying, "But wait...that's not REALLY fornication." :coffee2 |
Re: UPC Pastor Convicted of Slander in Pulpit!
Quote:
|
Re: UPC Pastor Convicted of Slander in Pulpit!
Quote:
|
Re: UPC Pastor Convicted of Slander in Pulpit!
Quote:
|
Re: UPC Pastor Convicted of Slander in Pulpit!
Quote:
|
Re: UPC Pastor Convicted of Slander in Pulpit!
Quote:
I agree that it was a bad judgment call on the part of the pastor. I'm just saying that I understand the mindset, and I can see a pastor feeling the need to justify giving his approval in such a situation. |
Re: UPC Pastor Convicted of Slander in Pulpit!
Quote:
I think the problem is that we're dealing with an environment where all such past issues were meet with the harshest of condemnations. That history can certainly lead to a very real "need" to justify oneself and one's family. If our shared culture didn't have such a harsh past that it was constantly seeking to justify, we wouldn't have these problems today. |
Re: UPC Pastor Convicted of Slander in Pulpit!
Quote:
BTW frog, would you mind discussing the thought of post #26 and #32. You can PM to me if you want. |
Re: UPC Pastor Convicted of Slander in Pulpit!
Quote:
|
Re: UPC Pastor Convicted of Slander in Pulpit!
Quote:
Retraction - unless made immediately after publication so as to negate the defamatory effect of a statement, retraction does not undo the wrong. But it may be considered by the court to show lack of actual malice in mitigation of damage. (Barbri on Torts) |
Re: UPC Pastor Convicted of Slander in Pulpit!
Quote:
|
Re: UPC Pastor Convicted of Slander in Pulpit!
Quote:
|
Re: UPC Pastor Convicted of Slander in Pulpit!
Quote:
|
Re: UPC Pastor Convicted of Slander in Pulpit!
Quote:
|
Re: UPC Pastor Convicted of Slander in Pulpit!
Quote:
|
Re: UPC Pastor Convicted of Slander in Pulpit!
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: UPC Pastor Convicted of Slander in Pulpit!
My friend Baron must learn the sacred words:
"It depends" There certain circumstances and even jurisdictions where you can be successfully sued and not really having told a lie, example - the false light doctrine. Which is a quasi-defamation tort action. |
Re: UPC Pastor Convicted of Slander in Pulpit!
Quote:
|
Re: UPC Pastor Convicted of Slander in Pulpit!
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I'm an idealist too. Marriage should last forever. But the fact is that this marriage was 6 months to a year from being over once the divorce process started. So once the man realized it was really over, once that knowledge became real to him, I would expect him to act more or less as a single man. Given the lengthy process it takes to have a divorce finalized I believe he realized his marriage was over and started to act more or less as a single man before his divorce was finalized. It was in this time period that I believe him and the pastors daughter began to grow close. I find nothing wrong with him acting single since he was soon to have an ex-wife instead of a wife. |
Re: UPC Pastor Convicted of Slander in Pulpit!
Quote:
BTW I wonder if the guy was a preacher in the church :bigbaby |
Re: UPC Pastor Convicted of Slander in Pulpit!
Quote:
|
Re: UPC Pastor Convicted of Slander in Pulpit!
Quote:
|
Re: UPC Pastor Convicted of Slander in Pulpit!
Quote:
|
Re: UPC Pastor Convicted of Slander in Pulpit!
Quote:
|
Re: UPC Pastor Convicted of Slander in Pulpit!
Quote:
|
Re: UPC Pastor Convicted of Slander in Pulpit!
Quote:
|
Re: UPC Pastor Convicted of Slander in Pulpit!
thanks frog.
|
Re: UPC Pastor Convicted of Slander in Pulpit!
Quote:
|
Re: UPC Pastor Convicted of Slander in Pulpit!
Quote:
|
Re: UPC Pastor Convicted of Slander in Pulpit!
Quote:
There is no doubt he had malice, and the point being it does not always require an overt lie to be successfully sued. :-) |
Re: UPC Pastor Convicted of Slander in Pulpit!
Quote:
|
Re: UPC Pastor Convicted of Slander in Pulpit!
Quote:
|
Re: UPC Pastor Convicted of Slander in Pulpit!
Quote:
|
Re: UPC Pastor Convicted of Slander in Pulpit!
Quote:
|
Re: UPC Pastor Convicted of Slander in Pulpit!
Quote:
If I am not reading too much in here, she is still going to church? |
Re: UPC Pastor Convicted of Slander in Pulpit!
Quote:
|
Re: UPC Pastor Convicted of Slander in Pulpit!
Quote:
|
Re: UPC Pastor Convicted of Slander in Pulpit!
Quote:
Here is an excerpt from an article: Public disclosure of private facts occurs when a writer discloses private and embarrassing facts about a living person that are not of "public concern." First Amendment rights protect publication of items of legitimate pubic concern, such as the details of a crime. Ask yourself, is the story newsworthy? If so, the public's interest in knowing about the incident outweighs the privacy factor. If, however, the matter is not one of public concern, and is one that most people would find highly offensive, there is an invasion of privacy. For example, publicizing the fact that your brother-in-law has failed to pay his mortgage for three months, although true, would be an invasion of his privacy. Other examples would be details of a person's sexual problems, physical or mental ailments. Problems often arise when writing about a real-life event: in such cases, you should obtain written releases from the "ordinary people" who are only peripherally involved with the newsworthy event. While this article addresses the new area of false light when publishing it still is a valid principle in some states. Which is why I am a great proponent of "it depends". For example, the present case was made worse by the pastor's obvious personal interest, if there were an overwhelming need to state something publicly like warning parents of a known child molester it would probably be ok, because it would be lacking the malicious element. On the other hand'- "it depends" :thumbsup |
Re: UPC Pastor Convicted of Slander in Pulpit!
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:21 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.