![]() |
Re: Water/Spirit Doctrine Destroyed Beautifully
Quote:
|
Re: Water/Spirit Doctrine Destroyed Beautifully
Quote:
|
Re: Water/Spirit Doctrine Destroyed Beautifully
Luke 6:43 For a good tree bringeth not forth corrupt fruit; neither doth a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit.
Luke 6:44 For every tree is known by his own fruit. For of thorns men do not gather figs, nor of a bramble bush gather they grapes. Luke 6:45 A good man out of the good treasure of his heart bringeth forth that which is good; and an evil man out of the evil treasure of his heart bringeth forth that which is evil: for of the abundance of the heart his mouth speaketh. |
Re: Water/Spirit Doctrine Destroyed Beautifully
Quote:
That makes you better than the next guy, so keep tooting your Self Righteous horn. |
Re: Water/Spirit Doctrine Destroyed Beautifully
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Water/Spirit Doctrine Destroyed Beautifully
Quote:
|
Re: Water/Spirit Doctrine Destroyed Beautifully
Quote:
|
Re: Water/Spirit Doctrine Destroyed Beautifully
Quote:
Remember, Jesus called the Religious, Blind. Religion isolates, infuriates, and creates hypocrites of the worst kind. Religion is nothing more than the illusion that someone is better than someone else, via an idea that someone else started with Spectral Evidence. |
Re: Water/Spirit Doctrine Destroyed Beautifully
Quote:
John 3:8 ...every one that is born of the Spirit. So now you have 3 births instead of 2. You have the natural birth with 2 parts. You have the spiritual birth with 2 parts. And you have the spirit birth with 1 part... |
Re: Water/Spirit Doctrine Destroyed Beautifully
Quote:
|
Re: Water/Spirit Doctrine Destroyed Beautifully
Quote:
|
Re: Water/Spirit Doctrine Destroyed Beautifully
Quote:
Hey, I thought you had 4 births...get your story straight...LOL BTW...I cant believe I am arguing with a frog....ribbitt...LOL |
Re: Water/Spirit Doctrine Destroyed Beautifully
Quote:
|
Re: Water/Spirit Doctrine Destroyed Beautifully
Quote:
|
Re: Water/Spirit Doctrine Destroyed Beautifully
Quote:
|
Re: Water/Spirit Doctrine Destroyed Beautifully
Quote:
Prax, you can just smell the bias in his position. The word "except" is used in the passage 2 times. Verse 5 for both water and Spirit, meaning "unless", which makes Spirit optional. But the water part in their mind is NOT optional. 3 Jesus answered and said unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except(unless, optional) a man be born again(optional), he cannot see the kingdom of God. 4 Nicodemus saith unto him, How can a man be born when he is old? can he enter the second time into his mother's womb, and be born? 5 Jesus answered, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except(unless, optional) a man be born of water(optional) and of the Spirit(optional)..(the clarification of BORN AGAIN above, ), he cannot enter into the kingdom of God. Using ambiotic fluid to replace water baptism in this passage is absolutely ridiculous....LOL I guess those that are born of a C- section cannot be saved, because they are not born of the water...LOL |
Re: Water/Spirit Doctrine Destroyed Beautifully
Quote:
"Unless" actually EXCLUDES something from being optional The word is a conditional (we learned about that in math) |
Re: Water/Spirit Doctrine Destroyed Beautifully
The only "option" that I see in John 3:3-7 is be to born AGAIN or not see or enter the Kingdom. That's really not much of an "option" to me.
|
Re: Water/Spirit Doctrine Destroyed Beautifully
Quote:
1. We know that Jesus was talking to nicodemus about a 2nd birth. 2. In John 3:8 Jesus speaks of a birth which occurs without water; "born of spirit" 3. If the 2nd birth that jesus was talking to nicodemus about included both a water and spirit portion then it makes little sense to call those born who only have the spirit portion. Yet that's exactly what Jesus called them. Ya see what I'm saying? |
Re: Water/Spirit Doctrine Destroyed Beautifully
Quote:
Except is the word that I was referring to as "optional".(except a man is born of water.....).... optional....(except a man is born of the Spirit).....optional. Optional(Except) means... "this is your option whether or not you want to be born again" to enter into the kingdom........ An example of a common use of the word except...." If you choose to be born again I will let you into the Kingdom of God....that is the "exception" I will make for you" "Unless" was only a synonym I used to help describe the word,"except". You may have missed the point I made, that these guys say that being born of water is NOT optional.....everyone from birth is born of water. Then all they need is the Spirit birth. Which is their option to be saved or not.(they dont automatically have it(Spirit from birth).....hope that clarifies. |
Re: Water/Spirit Doctrine Destroyed Beautifully
Quote:
|
Re: Water/Spirit Doctrine Destroyed Beautifully
Quote:
|
Re: Water/Spirit Doctrine Destroyed Beautifully
optional - definition
View thesaurus entry for optional What are red words? Using the thesaurus ADJECTIVE British English pronunciation: optional /ˈɒpʃ(ə)nəl/ something that is optional is available or possible if you want it, but you do not have to have it or do it The price includes hotel and meals – entertainment is optional. Add 200 grammes of walnuts (optional). The history course is optional, but English is compulsory. an optional extra (=something that is available, usually for more money): Remote central locking comes as an optional extra. Thesaurus entry for this meaning of optional I am saying the very statement of Jesus shows the individual has a choice to be born again or not to be born again...that is their OPTION. Jesus does not twist arms or coerce anyone to be born again. (you are not automatically born of water) Of course the end result if they dont is not being born again. |
Re: Water/Spirit Doctrine Destroyed Beautifully
Quote:
|
Re: Water/Spirit Doctrine Destroyed Beautifully
I think people should keep in mind that born again is best translated born from above. We have a natural birth, which is what Nicodemus thought Jesus was speaking of & why he brought up going back in a mother's womb (water), and a spiritual birth that come from above (spirit).
Understanding that this section of scripture is not saying water means baptism, does not negate all the scriptures that clearly show water baptism is a command and a normal part of turning to Jesus. |
Re: Water/Spirit Doctrine Destroyed Beautifully
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Water/Spirit Doctrine Destroyed Beautifully
Quote:
If you are saying, which you are, a person has a choice, that is true. But, technically, the word "except" implies "exclusion". |
Re: Water/Spirit Doctrine Destroyed Beautifully
Quote:
|
Re: Water/Spirit Doctrine Destroyed Beautifully
Quote:
|
Re: Water/Spirit Doctrine Destroyed Beautifully
Quote:
:happydance |
Re: Water/Spirit Doctrine Destroyed Beautifully
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Water/Spirit Doctrine Destroyed Beautifully
Quote:
Thats what I am saying there, Jesus was not telling Nicodemus he was already "water born", which in these guys doctrine, make it(water birth) NOT an option. The entire passage is what I was seeing, lead off by the word "except". The passage offers a a way into the Kingdom of God, if(optional, you may or may not want to...) a man is born again of water.....That is what I was implying.... I was seeing the whole passage as optional in this regard, thanks for pointing out the misunderstanding. Again, sorry about the misunderstanding. And thanks Prax |
Re: Water/Spirit Doctrine Destroyed Beautifully
Quote:
|
Re: Water/Spirit Doctrine Destroyed Beautifully
Quote:
|
Re: Water/Spirit Doctrine Destroyed Beautifully
Again I say, the necessity of water baptism as a step towards the new birth does not depend on the water/Spirit interpretation of John 3:5 being accurate. The doctrine of baptism for the remission of sins stands on its own scripturally without John 3:5.
|
Re: Water/Spirit Doctrine Destroyed Beautifully
Quote:
This is ridiculous! No one preaches physical act of speaking in tongues CAUSES salvation. Speaking in tongues is evidence of the Spirit already in a person. It's not the speaking in tongues that we want in order to be saved. It's the SPIRIT IN US. The evidence of a thing is not the the thing! And The SPIRIT is the goal, not its evidence. That write-up is simply dishonest! And baptism is not categorized as a WORK for salvation. When the bible talks about works for salvation it is talking about efforts to make ourselves righteous, not all actions in and of themselves. If baptism is regarded as a work then so must the CHOICE to accept salvation be a work of the mind, and therefore a WORK, nonetheless, for salvation. But baptism is the opposite of works to obtain righteousness. It is the BURYING and DEATH of all hopes of self doing anything to save self! We're good for nothing, as far as our works are concerned to save ourselves, so much so as to deserve death! To write what this guy said about baptism and tongues is absolutely dishonest as well as wrong. |
Re: Water/Spirit Doctrine Destroyed Beautifully
Quote:
|
Re: Water/Spirit Doctrine Destroyed Beautifully
Quote:
|
Re: Water/Spirit Doctrine Destroyed Beautifully
Quote:
|
Re: Water/Spirit Doctrine Destroyed Beautifully
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:55 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.