Re: QUESTION: DId only 72 join WPF???????
 

So that means there are only 71? What is your point?

There are obviously more than 72 ministers signed up for the WPF. Whether the UPCI folks like it or not.

Re: QUESTION: DId only 72 join WPF???????
 

My point is that you are making the assumption that the information on the website is 100% accurate. It would seem that is not the case.

Re: QUESTION: DId only 72 join WPF???????
 

Nothing is obvious with this group. I know for a fact at least three of the names on the website actually asked for their names to be removed from the list. They had never given permission for their names to be used and were quite upset that this happened.

What does that tell you about this group?

Re: QUESTION: DId only 72 join WPF???????
 

I think you assume what my assumptions are.:biggrin:

I don't assume that the site is 100% correct. Lets assume it is only 90% correct that means you only have to come up with another 16 or 17 names other than those listed, again a pretty safe assumption based on the churches of the 56 or so that would still be associated.

I do admit to making assumptions. Just not the one you assumed.:toofunny

Re: QUESTION: DId only 72 join WPF???????
 

Which 3?

Re: QUESTION: DId only 72 join WPF???????
 

Well, it's probably a secret, just like those who have joined.

Re: QUESTION: DId only 72 join WPF???????
 

You tell me!

That they learned from sitting at the feet of the best? :bubble

Re: QUESTION: DId only 72 join WPF???????
 

Maybe that's why we don't know who did join.

Re: QUESTION: DId only 72 join WPF???????
 

Exactly whose feet do the leadership of Tulsa sit at?

Re: QUESTION: DId only 72 join WPF???????
 

I know. Can you believe the audacity of this group. It has been 2 weeks since the meeting and they haven't published a directory yet. Haven't even posted names on the forums. :girlytantrum

Don't they know or care that the masses are waiting. :feedback