Originally Posted by Trouvere (Post 868273)

Yes and I suppose others that have gone on before you such
as
Sister Nona Freeman woman Apostle and great pioneer of many works in Africa. She put up gospel tents and preached many nights in dangerous places for Jesus.
Sister Carrie Eastridge woman missionary and mother of dear Sister Freeman.
Sister Agnes Rich (whom I counted very dear in this life.)
Sister Oma Ellis great woman Apostle who started many churches.
Sister Marie Lafleur a fantastic French woman Apostle who helped spread the
gospel among the Acadian's in Louisiana.
Sister Wilma Nix a great woman Apostle who brought the Gospel to places that barely had ever seen a white woman.


I am glad they answered the call and bore the example regardless of hatred,
hate mail or evil speaking against them.
Keep on Sister Alvear. Hell is too full and Heaven needs more saints than
it now possesses.

Originally Posted by rdp (Post 868378)

I see, so when he says "not with gold....and in modest apparel....". That clearly means what it says, but just 3 verses later when he says "I do not allow a woman to teach......", we need a special understanding to grasp the true meaning of his words....or else it's deemed as "bias"??????????????????

Not hardly.........................

Originally Posted by rdp (Post 868378)

I see, so when he says "not with gold....and in modest apparel....". That clearly means what it says, but just 3 verses later when he says "I do not allow a woman to teach......", we need a special understanding to grasp the true meaning of his words....or else it's deemed as "bias"??????????????????

Not hardly.........................

Originally Posted by rdp (Post 868380)

And what does any of this have to do w/ the very plain language of I Tim. 2:11-15 & I Cor. 14:34??????

Originally Posted by Jeffrey (Post 868369)

All of that and this is your tiny response? You aren't showing that you are taking people's responses serious. You just keep repeating the same stuff over and over. That's how you handle evidence?

Originally Posted by Jeffrey (Post 868373)

There you go talking ignorance again. Shall I quote ALL the scholars that aren't anti-women teachers/preachers?

Oh brother, here we go again. I simply quote an observation by a very scholarly man among us & now it's suddenly "ignorant"?????? Yea' reeeeeeeal "Christian" Jeffrey.

What a stupid thing to say. Shall we do an IQ test on all who are for and all who are against? Didn't think so...

Originally Posted by Trouvere (Post 868381)

You bypassed all the things the Brothers posted to you to answer my little comment. Forget it. I want to see you
answer those things first.

Originally Posted by rdp (Post 868391)

Originally Posted by rdp (Post 868394)

Will deal w/ Prax soon [when I have time] since his arguments are nothing new, Jeffrey cannot have a civil discussion w/out using terms like "stupid" & "ignorant", yet he's the great "exegete"???? Besides, I go in order.

Puhleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeezzzzeeee.................... ..

Originally Posted by rdp (Post 868378)

I see, so when he says "not with gold....and in modest apparel....". That clearly means what it says, but just 3 verses later when he says "I do not allow a woman to teach......", we need a special understanding to grasp the true meaning of his words....or else it's deemed as "bias"??????????????????

Not hardly.........................