![]() |
|
Re: UPC Pastor Convicted of Slander in Pulpit!
Quote:
|
Re: UPC Pastor Convicted of Slander in Pulpit!
Quote:
|
Re: UPC Pastor Convicted of Slander in Pulpit!
Regardless who stood up or for any man. GOD WILL NOT take the side of those that
do wrong, REGARDLESS OF WHO THEY ARE, GOD has seen the whole story from the beginning to the present. Quality control of a product is to determine if that product is able to stand in the "heat". Sometimes a "product" can be "repaired". There must be corrections and then back to the "furnace" for another "test". If the product is then not usuable, it is thrown into the "junk" or "trash" can! (referring to circuit boards.) GOD sees inside the hearts and minds and knows the thoughts and intents thereof. He knows the motives of all involved. The fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom. Also the beginning of knowledge and understanding. The fear of man bringeth a snare (trap). The fear of man bringeth a snare: but whoso putteth his trust in the LORD shall be safe. Prov. 29:25 Falla39 |
Re: UPC Pastor Convicted of Slander in Pulpit!
Quote:
And you are right. There are many good and decent men and women in Apostolic churches. People who not only don't toot their own horns, but don't expect-and don't need or have-someone patting them on the back all the time. And I'm thankful for them. |
Re: UPC Pastor Convicted of Slander in Pulpit!
Quote:
|
Re: UPC Pastor Convicted of Slander in Pulpit!
"Not all Pentecostal churches are like this," Kennedy said. "You've got a pastor not in line with mainstream beliefs and practices. But that doesn't explain his conduct. What explains his conduct is that he needed to do a character assassination. The preacher did a hit job on Angela. It was a purification process of the future son-in-law to transfer his sins to Angela so that the congregation would support the remarriage."
"Kennedy said his case was helped considerably by the testimony of Angela Driver's ex-husband, James, who told the jury that he had "never accused her of sexual immorality, never thought she cheated on him." The stated reason for the divorce was irreconcilable differences." Wow, the above really illustrates that this was probably all the pastor's idea--just to justify his daughter's marriage to Mr. Driver to the congregation. I wonder if the husband even knew in advance what his pastor was going to say in his "speech?" Somehow I doubt it. The Daily Report article is much better and more detailed than the original link we were given. :thumbsup "Trey Davis, the assistant pastor at her new church, testified that when he made a courtesy call to Angela Driver's old pastor to let him know she had found a new church, Fogarty slandered her again, saying she was a "compulsive liar" with a "spirit of a Jezebel."' Typical. It would be interesting to know how many couples have been forbidden to remarry under Fogarty's watch because they didn't divorce for permissible reasons. Or maybe...how many have been condemned because they remarried after an amicable divorce. :coffee2 |
Re: UPC Pastor Convicted of Slander in Pulpit!
Quote:
I pray for the members of Fogarty's church. So very hard to get over issues of mistrust. Very sad. |
Re: UPC Pastor Convicted of Slander in Pulpit!
No one is suggesting every upci minister is waiting to tar and feather their saints. The powers which be condone this behavior by looking the other way. You have a deft skill of making issues where there are none.
Quote:
|
Re: UPC Pastor Convicted of Slander in Pulpit!
Quote:
|
Re: UPC Pastor Convicted of Slander in Pulpit!
Quote:
More court testimony from the despotic pastor .... Quotes from Pastor Fogarty's testimony: “The Biblical definition of fornication is not what our modern day dictionary says. Adultery is fornication, but not all fornication is adultery… Actually any sexual misconduct or behavior, married or unmarried. That is fornication.” “Her clothes got tighter. Her hemlines got shorter …she wore improper underclothes,” and Fogarty added that he had his wife, Karen Fogarty, accompany Angela to shop for clothing. “I am sorry Angela was hurt. But if you’re asking if I’m sorry I said she was a fornicator? No, I’m not. That is what I believe.” “Maybe I shouldn’t have ever mentioned her name. I should have just said ‘James has the right to remarry' and left it at that.” From the taped message of July 25, 2006: “If you believe the standard definition of fornication then you do not believe that that person is free to remarry. But if you believe the full definition, which covers things such as perverted sex acts or perverted sexual spirit, the scripture is very clear on this.” “And so fornication covers things such as homosexuality, lesbianism, bestiality, lust, exhibitionism, pornography, child abuse, harlotry, prostitution, solicitation of sex and so forth. It covers all these things. Now I have personal knowledge that I will not go into, that Angela has committed one of these acts…. I’m not going to give you any more information about it. I will tell you that there was some abuse in – in the marriage.” Fogarty had no comment for the press after the trial. Barbara Marschalk, Fogarty's attorney, is stated to have issued a written response after the verdict, saying that she and her client were disappointed in the outcome and that they were reviewing possible appeal options. “We do not believe that the verdict is supported by the law or the facts, and in particular the law concerning the separation of church and state.” She felt further comment would be inappropriate. It would appear then, from those reports, that a main basis of defense was that Pastor Fogarty had a right to his interpretation of the Bible and that the courts should not become involved due to the separation of church and state. It was also felt that what happened did not fall into the definition of slander per se and it was questioned whether a claim for slander with no proof of special damages could be sustained. If any of this does not reflect what happened in his defense, I encourage Pastor Fogarty's attorney to contact me so that it may be readily corrected. (SpiritualAbuse.org) If her own husband does not think she committed sexual immorality ... why does this man continue to say she has? How does this man know about her underclothes? Seriously? You sent your wife to go shopping with her? Surely he has defined a new doctrine for fornication and refuses to budge from it ... why haven't his elders stepped in to correct this? IS TIGHT AND SHORT CLOTHING .... FORNICATION? ANYONE ON THE GEORGIA DISTRICT BOARD OR EXECUTIVE BOARD CARE TO RESPOND? If none care to answer I will have to ask each one individually via email .... including the fellowship ... starting with the 188 ministers in Georgia. This is a doctrinal and ecclesiastical issue. Why use the word "abuse" when he spoke to the church congregation? Is there abuse, Pastor Fogarty? Surely you should report this. By recognizing that he shouldn't have mentioned her by name ... and saying that he should have just said that James could remarry ... is exactly what this was all about ... isn't it? |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:11 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.